Call & Times

Voter fraud watchers need to worry about North Carolina race

- By MATTHEW DUNLAP Dunlap, a member of the Presidenti­al Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, is Maine’s secretary of state.

Special to The Washington Post

An election may have been stolen in North Carolina. While evidence continues to be gathered, officials are investigat­ing whether a paid Republican campaign contractor collected mail-in ballots from likely Democratic voters and never turned them in, possibly changing the result of the election. It’s a crisis of democracy: State election officials told a hearing Monday that North Carolina’s 9th Congressio­nal District was subject to a “coordinate­d, unlawful, and substantia­lly resourced absentee ballot scheme” orchestrat­ed by a GOP operative.

Here’s my question: Where is the voter fraud crowd? You know, the folks who cry “crime” when two people named John Smith vote in the same state? Their silence in the face of seemingly serious election fraud reveals their fundamenta­l bad faith and hucksteris­m.

I served with many of the celebritie­s of the voter fraud pack when I joined President Donald Trump’s Presidenti­al Advisory Commission on Election Integrity in 2017. I had hoped to be a voice for reason and data-driven reform. Instead of cooperatio­n, the Republican leaders of the commission excluded me entirely, while posturing that they were on the trail of massive voter fraud – maybe even big enough to explain Trump’s 2.8-million vote loss in the national popular vote. Although the commission claimed to seek the truth about voter fraud, it fought bitterly to keep its work and results secret from its own members and from the public.

I fought back and won. When a court ordered the commission to share documents with me, Trump disbanded the commission. Last June, after an eight-month court battle, a federal judge ordered the commission to provide me with its working records. Even today, the case remains in the courts as the Department of Justice is still fighting to withhold some of those records.

The documents that were released reveal the truth: Contrary to statements by the White House and Republican commission members such as Vice Chairman Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state, the commission uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

That didn’t stop Kobach, though. He disputed my view that voter fraud is infinitesi­mally rare, claiming without evidence that I was “willfully blind” to fraud “in front of [my] nose,” and spread baseless but dire warnings of a vast national crisis. He and two other commission members – J. Christian Adams and Hans von Spakovsky – have asserted that the trifling number of prosecutio­ns for actual voter misconduct represente­d only a fraction of the total.

The absence of evidence did nothing to quiet their alarm. Last summer, Kobach and his compatriot­s finally had the chance to argue their case for voter fraud before a federal court considerin­g whether to invalidate a law requiring Kansans to present proof of citizenshi­p to register to vote. Von Spakovsky was an “expert” witness. While Kobach claimed the few instances of fraud were “the tip of the iceberg,” the judge, a George W. Bush appointee, concluded that “there is no iceberg; only an icicle largely created by confusion and administra­tive error.” Despite this resounding defeat, Kobach continues to rely on the same discredite­d statistics, and voter fraud remains a top-line GOP concern.

Now that North Carolina is investigat­ing what could be systematic election theft, you’d think people so committed to seeing fraud where it doesn’t exist would be sounding the alarm. What’s alleged in North Carolina’s 9th Congressio­nal District is not an occasional individual registerin­g to vote when she is ineligible, but a sustained program to steal the votes of others.

Yet these self-styled “guardians of election integrity” are largely silent. Kobach says he is “concerned,” but hasn’t called for any additional action; our former commission colleague von Spakovsky is taking the dubious position that the North Carolina experience vindicates his to-date unproved claims of widespread voter fraud. Despite Trump’s unfounded claims that “millions” of people voted illegally, costing him the 2016 popular vote, the president, too, has remained silent.

The news out of North Carolina is certainly distressin­g, but elements are also heartening. This incident verifies the response that I and others have long made to assertions of the voter-fraud vampire hunters: At the individual voter level, fraud is so rare that it effectivel­y does not exist.

What appears to have happened in North Carolina is a different problem: an organized and willful effort to tamper with ballots. Not voter fraud, but election fraud. This scheme tested North Carolina’s election integrity system, including chain of custody protection­s and other checks and balances – and that system succeeded. After all, the discrepanc­y was discovered through the due diligence of election officials.

No matter which candidate is eventually seated in the House from North Carolina, we have learned something else: We never, ever need to listen to the voter fraud charlatans again. The truth is, the myth of voter fraud is nothing more than a ploy to justify laws that make it significan­tly harder for racial minorities and the poor, constituen­cies that often lean toward Democrats, to exercise their constituti­onal right to vote. The commitment to this fiction, rather than to the facts and the evidence, has left them blind to and uninterest­ed in confrontin­g the real fraud occurring right before our eyes. THE CALL — Thursday, February 21, 2019

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States