Call & Times

Senate passes resolution to limit Trump’s power to order military action against Iran

-

WASHINGTON — The Senate passed a resolution Thursday to limit President Donald Trump’s power to order military action against Iran without first seeking Congress’s permission, a bipartisan rebuke of his administra­tion’s resistance to involving the legislativ­e branch in decisions that some fear could lead to all-out war.

Eight Republican­s joined all Democrats in voting 55 to 45 for the measure, despite sharp warnings from Trump that challengin­g his war powers would “show weakness” and “sends a very bad signal” to Tehran. Trump will almost certainly veto the measure once it passes the House, and neither chamber of Congress has the votes to override that veto, lawmakers say.

Democrats behind the resolution say they are convinced the measure may yet influence Trump’s future decisions on the Middle East.

“We’ve been talking to our constituen­ts, we’ve been listening to them, and we know what they think about another war in the Middle East right now,” said Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va. “[Trump’s] got an election that he’s focused on and he wants to win. ...He could well veto it and then adjust behavior.”

Half the Senate Republican­s who broke ranks with Trump had done so before on the same issue. In June, Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Mike Lee, R-Utah, Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Jerry Moran, R-Kan., joined Democrats in backing an amendment to the annual defense bill requiring that Trump approach Congress before taking military action against Iran, except in cases of clear self-defense or imminent attack.

In March 2019, those four Republican senators, along with Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Todd Young, R-Ind., joined Democrats to back a war-powers resolution ordering the president to stop helping the Saudi-led military campaign in Yemen.

The number of GOP senators willing to cross Trump over his Iran policy has risen in the wake of the strike last month that killed top Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani, amid the possibilit­y that it could have triggered a wider war without any congressio­nal involvemen­t.

Sens. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Bill Cassidy, R-La., who have voted with Trump on previous Iran and war-powers measures, joined the group of Republican­s breaking with the president Thursday, stating that there are limits to how much the president can do without first consulting Congress. For some of those Republican­s, the vote was not a criticism of the Soleimani strike but an assertion of the need for congressio­nal authorizat­ion before the administra­tion embarks on a conflict.

“If this resolution was in effect at the beginning of the year, President Trump would have still been able to carry out strikes against Iran and General Soleimani (which I supported),” Cassidy said in a statement explaining his vote. “The founders gave Congress the power to declare war under Article 1 of the Constituti­on; we should fulfill this responsibi­lity.”

Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, argued against the resolution, saying that Congress’ time would be better spent passing a resolution cheering Trump, as it did for President Barack Obama for ordering the operation that led to the death of Osama bin Laden - who, Risch argued, posed a much less imminent threat to the country than Soleimani did.

Presidents of both parties, including George W. Bush, Obama and Trump, have said they have the right to order military action as a matter of self-defense when they see threats they define as “imminent.” But some lawmakers say the executive branch has expanded its war powers to the detriment of Congress, particular­ly when it invokes congressio­nal authorizat­ions passed in 2001 and 2002 to support action in conflicts never envisioned at that time.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States