Call & Times

There’s an easy solution to online ‘bullying’ – walk away

- By MEGAN MCARDLE

WASHINGTON – – “I don’t think anyone really understand­s how cruel the internet is until you’re on the other side of it,” said TikTok influencer Dutch de Carvalho in a recent video. Wrapped in a blanket, sounding perilously close to tears, he continued, “Nothing prepares you for scrolling past thousands and thousands of people saying some of the cruelest things that you’ve ever seen in your life . . . and I know I could just stop posting, but I feel like it’s important.”

So much to unpack in that 30 seconds of video!

There is, of course, the dramatic backstory, so annoyingly emblematic of our era. (I don’t even have to tell you, do I? Yup, one of their videos went viral a few days ago and got another TikToker fired . . . whereupon the internet retaliated by putting de Carvalho through his own taste of viral hell.) Then there’s the wounded shock at the cruelty of viral mobs – – expressed by someone who just helped create one. And finally, there’s the inability to walk away from the screen.

That is, of course, a common malady – – even among those who aren’t being hit by a troll brigade. But it’s particular­ly pernicious when dealing with trolls, because it just encourages further abuse. Perversely, almost all the things that people do to try to shut down these kinds of attacks actually ensure that more of them will happen.

I’ve now been surviving troll brigades for 20 years – – since before social media, even. After two decades of death threats, slander and profanity-laced suggestion­s that I engage in improbable sexual acts, I’ve learned there is only one effective way to respond to any of it: don’t. It’s a rigged game, and the only way to win is to ignore the invitation to participat­e.

Unfortunat­ely, we’re now discourage­d from telling people to do the only thing that works. Saying “ignore it” supposedly downplays the serious harm these attacks can do, especially to marginaliz­ed groups. It normalizes abuse. Instead, we’re all supposed to expose the harm, call out the attackers and press online platforms for better moderating tools.

This is well-meant, but far too optimistic. No technology filter will ever keep people from saying horrible things on the internet; at best, it can filter out a few of the ugliest words. Nor does it help to point out that trolling is mean.

Trolls are not misguided people who accidental­ly hurt your feelings. They are rage-filled narcissist­s who want two things: your attention and your pain. Any response you can think of just gives them what they want.

When you argue, they rejoice that you care about their opinion. When you complain that it hurts, they revel in your agony. When others leap in to explain how traumatizi­ng this all is, they’re even more satisfied – – now they have everyone’s attention! The only way to punish trolls is to refuse to acknowledg­e that they exist. Better yet, don’t care.

Of course, I understand that it takes an unusually thick skin, or long experience, to shrug off so many people saying such amazingly awful things. But for the inexperien­ced, there is a technology hack that lets you simulate not caring: Turn off social media, and if necessary, email and your phone, until the trolls run out of steam.

If you are subjected to mass attack, you should use this trick. If you see someone else in this position, you should encourage them to take a break rather than make things worse.

Trolls have the attention span of a gnat. If you engage, you’ll renew their interest. If you go away, then within a few days, they’ll get bored, and you can resume your online life as if nothing happened.

Because in fact, nothing of any consequenc­e did happen. (Obviously, we are talking about simple trolling, not a cancellati­on mob where jobs or friendship­s are at stake.) IKillFasci­stsForBrea­kfast451 will not be sitting across the table from you at Thanksgivi­ng dinner. You will not be sharing a lifeboat with MAGAChoad3­000.

The only way these people matter at all is if you decide to let them. As long as you don’t react, they are just shouting pointlessl­y into the abyss.

It would, of course, be better if they stopped; it is lovely to dream of a world in which no one is ever gratuitous­ly cruel to strangers, or where some sort of super-filter stops such nastiness before anyone can see it. But we don’t have any reliable way to make nasty jerks into better people – – if they cared enough about others to make social pressure effective, they wouldn’t be spewing bile at strangers.

In the here-and-now, the best we can do is a collective etiquette of cheerful obliviousn­ess.

It may be unsatisfyi­ng, and it’s certainly less than ideal. But it’s still better than making ourselves accomplice­s in their vicious work.

––

Follow Megan McArdle on Twitter, @asymmetric­info.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States