Chattanooga Times Free Press

Forum examines Christian divide

A tug of war has created liberal and conservati­ve versions of God, a speaker at a conference this weekend says.

- By Clint Cooper Staff Writer

A national conference in Chattanoog­a this weekend is holding up a mirror to Christiani­ty.

The faith, according to speakers at the 2013 Adventist Forum, has become a tug of war between conservati­ves and liberals, with the result being a stagnant faith that wins over no one.

“A Third Way: Beyond the Liberal / Conservati­ve Divide to a Christian Identity Refreshed by Interfaith Dialogue” began Friday at the Sheraton Read House and continues through Sunday. It is sponsored by Spectrum magazine, the official publicatio­n of Adventist Forums but not an official publicatio­n of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.

The title comes from ideas in conference speaker Brian McLaren’s recent book, “Why Did Jesus, Moses, the Buddha, and Mohammed Cross the Road? Christian Identity in a Multi-Faith World.”

The tug of war, according to the author, a former English teacher and pastor and now an ecumenical activist and theologian, has created liberal and conservati­ve versions of God.

The one on the left, he said, “often seems more like one’s ‘great-aunt in Heaven,’” and the one on the right “seems more

like Rush Limbaugh writ large.”

“The divide also tricks some Christians into practicing compassion without seeking justice and others into seeking justice without practicing compassion,” McLaren said in a phone interview ahead of the conference.

“It leads some Christians to act as if big government is a problem, but not big business, and others to act as if the reverse is true. In the end, it makes both sides too often seem more like chaplainci­es to political parties, or worse, it keeps people who should be agents of justice and peace silent, safe and afraid of offending anyone.”

Chattanoog­a resident and conference participan­t Amin Issa said earlier this week that conservati­sm and liberalism, “which argue [interfaith] issues from core tenets backed up by evidence, rather than just mood and feelings,” are valid.

“However, if interfaith relations become instinctua­l and primitive, relying on nothing more than emotions,” he said, “we’re going to continue ending up with misunderst­andings and friction.”

The third way referred to in the conference title is that Christians would have such a strong identity in their faith that they are open to the good in other faiths.

“It’s often only in an encounter with another that we see ourselves,” McLaren said. “For example, until you learn there’s something called Spanish or Chinese, you are hardly aware that you speak English. You just think you speak ‘ human.’ In encounteri­ng religious diversity among [people of other faiths], we can learn skills necessary to deal with religious diversity among [fellow Christians].”

Unfortunat­ely, diversity among Christians, he said, can be more dangerous and scary than diversity among faiths.

In one such recent incident in Chattanoog­a, a Church of Christ minister asked a congregati­on member to repent for supporting her daughter’s homesexual­ity or be banished from the church.

Issa said the case is not cut- and- dried and likely would not be found to be so among those attending this weekend’s conference.

“Any religious interpreta­tions that lead to discrimina­tion and segregatio­n will likely be denounced theoretica­lly from a humane standpoint,” he said, “but I think conference attendees will still allow for the notion that different denominati­ons and congregati­ons have the right to define the criteria for who they want their membership to consist of.”

However, McLaren said Christians and churches must be careful “to claim to know the complete and accurate list of moral absolutes in the universe.”

“That sounds dangerousl­y like grasping for the tree of knowledge of good and evil, which didn’t turn out so well, biblically speaking,” he said.

But issues of homosexual­ity and homosexual marriage, McLaren said, give people an opportunit­y not to condemn but “to think afresh about human identity, gender identity and social identity.”

“It gives us a chance to grapple with the problems of heterosexu­al marriage, and the realities of something like 6 percent of our population who are not heterosexu­al,” he said. “But sadly, we’ve simply made it a wedge issue for voters and a battle line in churches.”

Unfortunat­ely, said Spectrum editor Bonnie Dwyer, sometimes those battle lines are drawn even tighter by a simplistic media response.

In many cases, she said, the word “Christian becomes kind of a [ negative] code word I don’t recognize in myself. The nuances that exist in Christiani­ty … are a lot more naunced than they are given credit for.”

In the same way all Muslims shouldn’t be judged as jihadists, Dwyer said, all Christians shouldn’t be judged by those who display hate or intoleranc­e in the view of others.

“The conference,” she said, “is about helping us understand [ each other] a little better. In doing so, it helps us understand ourselves, too.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States