Chattanooga Times Free Press

Free market has proved a boon to consumers and environmen­t

-

Independen­ce​ Day​ gas​ prices​ last​ month​ were​ at​ their​ lowest​ levels​ in​ 11​ years ,​ and​ carbon​ emissions​ are​ near ​20- year​ lows​ thanks​ largely​ to​ greater​ use​ of​ clean-burning​ natural​gas.

America’ s​ energy​ resurgence​has​ been​ a​ bo on​ for​ consumers​ and​ for​ climate​ goals ,​ with​ the​ United​ States​ leading​ the​ world​ in​ both​ production​ of​ oil​ and​ natural​ gas​ and​ in​ reduction​ of​ green-house​ gas​ emissions.

Maintainin­g​ those​ achievemen­ts​ should​ be​ a​ top​ priority​ for​ Republican­s​ and​ Democrats​crafting​ their​ party​ platforms​ for​ the ​2016​ election .​ But​ reports​ indicate​ party​ officials​ are​ considerin­g​policies​ that​ could​ de rail​ U.S .​ energy​ leadership.

According​ to​ Carol​ Brown er ,​ a​ former​ Environmen­tal​ Protection​ Agency​ head​ and​ a​ current​ member​ of​ the​ Democratic​ platform​ drafting​ committee,​ the​ party’s​ draft​ 2016​ platform ​“moves​ decisive ly​ beyond​ an ​‘ all-of-the-above ’​ energy​ strategy ”​ and​ includes​ an​ amendment​ to ​“phase​ down​ fossil​ fuel​ production.”

Despite​ the​ proven​ success​ of​ natural​ gas​ in​ reducing​ emissions ,​ it​ doesn’ t​ appear​ to​ be​ part​ of​ the​ plan ,​ which​ seems​ geared​ toward​ leaving​ oil​ and​ natural​ gas​ out​ of​ the​ energy​ strategy​ equation.

The​ problem?​ Relying​ solely​ on​ renewables​ like​ wind​ and​ solar​ is​ not​ realistic .​ According​ to​ the​ federal​ Energy​ Informatio­n​ Administra­tion ,​ oil​ and​ natural​ gas​ will​ still​ supply ​60​ percent​of​ U.S .​ energy​ needs​ in ​2040​ even​ under​ optimistic​ scenarios​ for​ renewable​ energy​ growth.

Attempts to circumvent this reality inevitably involve meddling with the free market — usually a costly and disruptive propositio­n for consumers.

Take the Renewable Fuel Standard, or RFS, which forces ethanol into the fuel supply. Voting with their wallets, drivers have made it clear that they’re not interested in higher ethanol blends, which require more frequent fill-ups and can cause engine damage.

Neverthele­ss, the EPA doggedly increases ethanol requiremen­ts each year, threatenin­g to increase ethanol volumes beyond the standard 10 percent blend (E10) to 15 percent (E15) or higher.

Approximat­ely 90 percent of vehicles on the road today were not designed to use higher ethanol blends, and automakers warn ethanol-related engine damage may not be covered by warranty.

On top of mechanic bills, continuing to increase ethanol volumes could drive up prices at the pump — by 26 cents per gallon, according to the nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office.

More market disruption­s could be on the horizon.

The EPA’s Clean Power Plan would impose additional regulation­s on the nation’s power plants in order to reduce carbon emissions. But we’ve already cut carbon, and it didn’t take command-and-control government mandates.

Since 2005, greenhouse gas emissions from power generation are down about 17 percent, more than halfway to the 32 percent reduction EPA claims the new regulation­s will achieve by 2030.

The EIA attributes much of this reduction to “increased use of natural gas for electricit­y generation.” The government didn’t force power plants to switch to clean-burning natural gas; its affordabil­ity and lower emissions were all the incentive needed.

Natural gas has reduced both emissions and consumer electric costs — at least where infrastruc­ture is in place to deliver it.

In New York, which just rejected a natural gas pipeline that could have created jobs and lowered electricit­y rates, residents pay almost 60 percent more than the national average for power.

That’s what happens when energy policy is driven by political ideology instead of free market principles. When the free market is allowed to work you get an American energy renaissanc­e that has added $1,337 to the average American family budget and cut costs for manufactur­ers.

We’ve also cut greenhouse gas emissions more than any nation on earth. To maintain that progress — and America’s status as a global energy superpower — both parties should adopt market-based, consumer-focused platforms.

Jack Gerard is the president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, the national trade associatio­n that represents all aspects of America’s oil and natural gas industry.

 ??  ?? Jack Gerard
Jack Gerard

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States