Chattanooga Times Free Press

Suit: Voter registrati­on process violates the law

- BY KATE BRUMBACK

ATLANTA — Georgia’s voter registrati­on process violates the Voting Rights Act and has prevented tens of thousands of residents, mostly minorities, from registerin­g to vote, according to a federal lawsuit filed Wednesday.

Under a policy implemente­d in 2010, people aren’t added to voter rolls if identifyin­g informatio­n on their applicatio­ns doesn’t exactly match informatio­n in databases maintained by the Georgia Department of Driver Services or the Social Security Administra­tion, the lawsuit says.

“What Georgia is doing is denying people the ability to make it onto the registrati­on rolls at the outset, which is what’s so problemati­c about this matching program,” said Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, one of the organizati­ons that filed the lawsuit.

A spokeswoma­n for Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp called the lawsuit “an effort by liberal groups to disrupt voter registrati­on just weeks before November’s important election.”

“The verificati­on process Georgia currently uses was pre-cleared by the U.S.

Department of Justice in 2010,” spokeswoma­n Candice Broce said in an email. Kemp, a Republican, is the state’s top elections official.

The state told the Department of Justice in 2010 that the verificati­on process is “designed to assure the identity and eligibilit­y of voters and to prevent fraudulent or erroneous registrati­ons,” according to a letter included as an exhibit to the lawsuit.

Georgia is among a small number of states with such policies, said Julie Houk, one of the lawyers who filed the suit. Some other states with similar policies have made changes to give people more time to fix problems, or they flag an applicant’s name so that when the person shows up to vote he or she is asked for ID to remedy the problem.

Federal law requires Georgia to keep an electronic statewide voter registrati­on database of informatio­n collected by local election officials. The state must verify the informatio­n against databases kept by the Department of Driver Services or the Social Security Administra­tion.

Georgia law requires the secretary of state’s office to match voter registrati­on informatio­n with the Department of Driver Services database to verify its accuracy.

For multiple reasons the records may not exactly match, including many that aren’t the fault of the potential voter, the lawsuit says. Data entry errors, typos or misread handwritin­g can cause mismatches. Hyphenated and maiden names or initials, as well as transposed digits in a driver’s license or Social Security number, can also cause problems.

These issues disproport­ionately affect African-American, Latino and Asian-American applicants, in part because they are more likely to have hyphens or other symbols in their names or to have multiple or compound last names, Houk said.

Federal and state laws don’t require that the informatio­n fields match exactly, nor do they require mismatched applicatio­ns to be canceled, the lawsuit says.

Under the Georgia policy, a mismatch triggers a letter notifying the applicant of the problem. If the applicant doesn’t respond within 40 days, the applicatio­n is automatica­lly canceled.

Minorities generally have higher poverty rates and less education, Houk said, meaning they may not understand what must be done if they get a letter or they may have less flexible work schedules or lack access to transporta­tion.

“This exact match program should be viewed alongside photo ID laws and burdensome documentar­y proof of citizenshi­p requiremen­ts which are all, at the end of the day, efforts aimed at making access to the ballot box more difficult,” Clarke said.

The lawsuit asks a judge to rule that Georgia’s voter registrati­on protocol violates the Voting Rights Act, as well as constituti­onal rights to free speech and associatio­n, equal protection and due process.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States