Chattanooga Times Free Press

Fallout escalates from Trail of Tears damage

- BY BEN BENTON STAFF WRITER

The fallout continues after the constructi­on more than two years ago of 35 earthen berms along almost a mile of the Trail of Tears in the Cherokee National Forest.

A whistle-blower group has now called for an independen­t investigat­ion, and the Tennessee Historical Commission has withdrawn from a 2005 cultural resource protection agreement with the U.S. Forest Service.

On Sept. 19, the nonprofit group Public Employees for Environmen­tal Responsibi­lity, known as PEER, filed a complaint with U.S. Secretary of Agricultur­e Tom Vilsack. Meanwhile, U.S. Department of Agricultur­e Inspector General Phyllis Fong is seeking an independen­t investigat­ion of damage done in the March 2014 Forest Service’s erroneous constructi­on of four “tank traps” and 32 “water bars” across almost a mile of the Trail of Tears in Monroe County.

The constructi­on was an attempt to address erosion issues, as well as an effort to dissuade people from using the trail for offroading.

“This is the most blatant

official desecratio­n of a sacred site in modern American history,” PEER executive director Jeff Ruch said this week in a statement on the complaint and historical commission’s move.

On Sept. 6, the Tennessee Historical Commission issued a letter notifying Cherokee National Forest officials that the state agency is voiding a 2005 agreement with the federal office on management of cultural resources in the federally managed forest.

E. Patrick McIntyre Jr., executive director and historic preservati­on officer for the commission, wrote in the letter that the state agency will review any further work proposals before they’re implemente­d.

“In light of the recent discovery of the Forest Service’s failure to comply with the stipulatio­ns in the Programmat­ic Agreement and resultant mismanagem­ent of a previously identified historic property — the Unicoi Turnpike/ Trail of Tears — located in the Tellico Plains District, this office finds it necessary and appropriat­e to remove itself from the Agreement,” McIntyre wrote. “By doing so, this office considers the stipulatio­ns agreed to in the document as void.”

In the end, the damage done to the trail was the result of a $28,000 contract, a few days’ worth of bulldozing and one hand not watching what the other was doing.

Ruch on Thursday called the Forest Service’s damage an example of “jaw-dropping” incompeten­ce. PEER began its own probe on behalf of concerned public employees, he said.

U.S. Forest Service officials admit to the damage and have apologized to tribal leaders, calling the damage a “terrible error” and recognizin­g “that we have caused emotional strife for many tribal members,” according to a response sent to the Times Free Press on Sept. 14 from the Forest Service office in Atlanta.

The Forest Service has not responded to follow-up questions emailed to the Atlanta and Cleveland, Tenn., offices on Sept. 15 and 21.

In 2014, the 461-acre tract containing the section of the Trail of Tears was preserved in a joint effort by the Forest Service and the nonprofit organizati­on The Conservati­on Fund. The protected trail also was intended to create connecting footpaths between nearby historic sites.

Land acquisitio­n for the protected parcel began more than a decade ago with the first tract that had identifiab­le segments of the Unicoi Turnpike/Trail of Tears roadbed. In 2009, the segment of the Unicoi Turnpike between Hayesville, N.C., and Athens, Tenn., was made part of the official Trail of Tears.

A Forest Service timeline developed from its internal review obtained by PEER indicates that conversati­ons about work to stop erosion and block access to off-roaders began in January 2013.

Points of erosion were found on logging roads and “skid trails” from timber cutting in years past, but the timeline doesn’t mention erosion on the Trail of Tears/Unicoi Turnpike roadbed.

From the timeline, it appears that a meeting on July 25, 2013, among forest service officials left some planners confused. The parcel had not been purchased for preservati­on yet.

“The district ranger and forest hydrologis­t left the meeting thinking that there were no cultural resource concerns, and that they had concurrenc­e to move forward with the erosion stabilizat­ion work,” the timeline states. “Both the forest archaeolog­ist and the assistant forest archaeolog­ist left the meeting unaware of any project work or project proposal being conceived and agreed upon within the Trail of Tears.”

This point of miscommuni­cation persisted into early 2014 as moves to acquire the land for preservati­on continued. The berm work was said by a forest hydrologis­t to be approved by the district ranger on Jan. 30, 2014, and the berm and “tank trap” work was performed from March 3-7, 2014, with several large “tank traps” being built a few weeks later at the TVA-gated entrance off of Joe Brown Highway. The traps serve to make it difficult or impossible for vehicles to use the path.

The parcel of land containing the Trail of Tears was transferre­d to the Forest Service on Sept. 25, 2014.

But before trail damage from the work was discovered, the district ranger was promoted out of that office in December 2014 into a forest supervisor position, then retired in February 2015.

The trail damage was not discovered until a group participat­ing in a stakeholde­rs meeting on the Trail of Tears visited the site on July 14, 2015.

“Most of the group is astounded and perplexed by the work that was done,” the timeline states. “Two U.S. attorney’s office staff members are informally notified about the damage and tribal representa­tives are notified.”

Nothing has been done yet to repair the damage that’s now more than two years old, Ruch said last week.

 ?? STAFF FILE PHOTO ?? In 2014, Jim Sirmans, with the Coker Creek Heritage Group, scales one of the 35 berms mistakenly built by the U.S. Forestry Service.
STAFF FILE PHOTO In 2014, Jim Sirmans, with the Coker Creek Heritage Group, scales one of the 35 berms mistakenly built by the U.S. Forestry Service.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States