Chattanooga Times Free Press

› Trump sticks by his unproven accusation that Barack Obama wiretapped his telephones,

- BY PETER BAKER AND STEVEN ERLANGER NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump refused to back down on Friday after his White House aired an unverified claim that Britain’s spy agency secretly monitored him during last year’s campaign at the behest of President Barack Obama.

Although his aides in private conversati­ons since Thursday night had tried to calm British officials who were livid over the claim, Trump made clear that he felt the White House had nothing to retract or apologize for. He said his spokesman was simply repeating an assertion made by a Fox News commentato­r.

“We said nothing,” Trump told a German reporter who asked about the matter at a joint White House news conference with Chancellor Angela Merkel. “All we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the one responsibl­e for saying that on television. I didn’t make an opinion on it.” He added: “You shouldn’t be talking to me. You should be talking to Fox.”

Trump, who has stuck by his unsubstant­iated assertion that Obama ordered his telephone tapped last year despite across-the-board denials, wryly used Merkel’s visit to repeat his contention. Merkel was angry during Obama’s administra­tion at reports that the United States had tapped her cellphone and those of other foreign leaders. Turning to her, Trump said, “At least we have something in common, perhaps.”

After the news conference Spicer echoed Trump’s defiant tone. “I don’t think we regret anything,” he told reporters. “As the president said, I was just reading off media reports.”

Shortly afterward, Fox backed off the claim made by its commentato­r, Andrew Napolitano. “Fox News cannot confirm Judge Napolitano’s commentary,” anchor Shepard Smith said on air. “Fox News knows of no evidence of any kind that the now president of the United States was surveilled at any time, any way. Full stop.”

A spokesman for Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain said Friday the White House had backed off the allegation. “We’ve made clear to the administra­tion that these claims are ridiculous and should be ignored,” the spokesman said on the condition of anonymity in keeping with British protocol. “We’ve received assurances these allegation­s won’t be repeated.”

Kim Darroch, the British ambassador to Washington, spoke with Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, at a St. Patrick’s Day reception in Washington on Thursday night just hours after Spicer aired the assertion at his daily briefing. Mark Lyall Grant, the prime minister’s national security adviser, spoke separately with his U.S. counterpar­t, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster.

“Ambassador Kim Darroch and Sir Mark Lyall expressed their concerns to Sean Spicer and General McMaster,” a White House official said on the condition of anonymity to confirm private conversati­ons. “Mr. Spicer and General McMaster explained that Mr. Spicer was simply pointing to public reports, not endorsing any specific story.”

Other White House officials, who also requested anonymity, said Spicer had offered no regret to the ambassador. “He didn’t apologize, no way, no how,” said a senior West Wing official. The officials said they did not know whether McMaster had apologized.

The controvers­y over Trump’s 2-week-old unsubstant­iated accusation that Obama had wiretapped his telephones last year continued to unnerve even fellow Republican­s. Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla., said Friday that Trump had not proven his case and should apologize to Obama.

“Frankly, unless you can produce some pretty compelling truth, I think President Obama is owed an apology,” Cole told reporters. “If he didn’t do it, we shouldn’t be reckless in accusation­s that he did.”

The flap with Britain started when Spicer, in the course of defending Trump’s original accusation against Obama, on Thursday read from the White House lectern comments by Napolitano asserting that the British spy agency was involved. Napolitano said on air that Obama had used Britain’s Government Communicat­ions Headquarte­rs, the signals agency known as the GCHQ , to spy on Trump.

The GCHQ quickly and vehemently denied the contention Thursday in a rare statement issued by the spy agency, calling the assertions “nonsense” and “utterly ridiculous.” By Friday morning, Spicer’s briefing had turned into a full-blown internatio­nal incident. British politician­s expressed outrage and demanded apologies and retraction­s from the U.S. government.

Trump’s critics assailed the White House for alienating America’s ally. “The cost of falsely blaming our closest ally for something this consequent­ial cannot be overstated,” Susan E. Rice, who was Obama’s national security adviser, wrote on Twitter. “And from the PODIUM.”

In pointing the finger at Britain on Thursday, Spicer read from comments made by Napolitano on Fox this week. “Three intelligen­ce sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command,” Spicer read. “He didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA, he didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use the Department of Justice. He used GCHQ.”

“What is that?” Spicer continued. “It’s the initials for the British intelligen­ce spying agency. So simply, by having two people saying to them, ‘The president needs transcript­s of conversati­ons involved in candidate Trump’s conversati­ons involving President-elect Trump,’ he was able to get it and there’s no American fingerprin­ts on this.”

In London, outrage quickly followed. “It’s complete garbage. It’s rubbish,” Malcolm Rifkind, a former chairman of Parliament’s intelligen­ce committee, told BBC News.

GCHQ was the first agency to warn the U.S. government, including the National Security Agency, that Russia was hacking Democratic Party emails during the presidenti­al campaign. That warning stemmed from internet traffic out of Russia containing malware, British officials said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States