Chattanooga Times Free Press

‘Mother of all bombs’ claims 36 militants in Afghanista­n

- Informatio­n for this story was contribute­d by Amir Shah, Anwarullah Khan, Munir Ahmed, Robert Burns and Maamoun Youssef of The Associated Press; by Justin Sink and Eltaf Najafizada of Bloomberg News; and W.J. Hennigan and Sultan Faizy of Tribune News Serv

KABUL, Afghanista­n — The most powerful nonnuclear bomb ever dropped in combat killed 36 militants in eastern Afghanista­n, officials said Friday. The strike using the Massive Ordnance Air Blast, or MOAB, was carried out Thursday against an Islamic State group tunnel complex carved in the mountains that Afghan forces have tried to assault repeatedly in recent weeks in fierce fighting in Nangarhar province.

U.S. and Afghan forces have been battling the Taliban insurgency for more than 15 years. But the U.S. military used the GBU-43/B for the first time to hit the Islamic State, which has a smaller but growing presence in Afghanista­n.

On Friday, the Afghan Defense Ministry said in a statement the GBU-43 bomb destroyed several caves and ammunition caches used by the Islamic State.

Gen. Daulat Waziri, a ministry spokesman, said 36 Islamic State fighters were killed, and the death toll could rise. He said Afghan forces were at the tunnel complex assessing the damage. The Islamic State’s Aamaq news agency denied any of its fighters were killed or wounded, citing a source within the group.

Waziri said the bombing was necessary because the complex was extremely hard to penetrate, with some tunnels as deep as 130 feet. He called it a “strong position,” with troops attacking it four times without advancing, adding that the complex “was full of mines.”

Not all Afghani officials supported the bomb’s use.

Afghanista­n’s ambassador to Pakistan, Omar Zakhilwal, protested the U.S. attack on Twitter Friday, posting: “I find the use of the largest non-nuclear bomb, the so called ‘mother of all bombs,’ on our soil reprehensi­ble and counterpro­ductive. If big bombs were the solution we would be the most secure place on earth today.”

The bomb, nicknamed the “mother of all bombs,” is so big that it’s rolled out the back of an MC-130 Hercules cargo aircraft instead of being carried in a bomber’s internal bay or slung beneath the wings or fuselage.

While the GBU-43, weighing nearly 21,600 pounds, is the United States’ largest convention­al bomb, it’s not the heaviest used in warfare, nor the most powerful ever developed.

The 30-foot-long, 21,600pound GBU-43 detonates with the force of 18,000 pounds of tritonal explosives. The GBU-43 initially falls with a parachute before a GPS guidance system guides the bomb to its target. The munition detonates before it hits the ground, sending a lethal shock wave more than 1 1/2 miles away, as well as creating a mushroom cloud that roils high into the sky.

In terms of size, the British “Grand Slam” bomb — dropped by the Royal Air Force more than 40 times in the final months of World War II — measured 26 feet long and weighed 22,000 pounds. It sent a shockwave into the ground — the equivalent of a small earthquake — to damage or destroy buildings, bridges and other structures. Although heavier than the GBU-43, the Grand Slam delivered a smaller blast yield. And, the most powerful non-nuclear bomb ever made comes from Russia, which in 2007 announced that it developed a bomb nicknamed “FOAB” — the father of all bombs — described as delivering a blast yield fourtimes larger than the GBU-43, according to CNN.

For the U.S., the GBU43 is the successor to the 15,000-pound BLU-82 “Daisy-Cutter” bomb from the Vietnam-era, which was used to clear trees from a 500-foot ground area so helicopter­s could land. That weapon was used in 1991 in the Gulf War against Iraq, later against Taliban and al-Qaida forces, and in Afghanista­n for mine-clearing in 2001.

The GBU-43 is about 40 percent more powerful than the Daisy Cutter, which was dropped on the Tora Bora cave complex where Osama bin Laden was said to be hiding in 2001. The U.S. developed the BLU-118/B “Bunker Buster” in the early 2000s to penetrate undergroun­d targets. Its hard skin allowed it to go through more than 6 feet of concrete before it exploded. “Bunker Busters” were used on targets in Baghdad during the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

The GBU-43 was developed in 2002 to “put pressure on then-Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to cease and desist or the United States would not only have the means but use them against the unpopular tyrant,” the Air Force said in a 2008 news release. While it was tested at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida, producing a mushroom cloud visible from 20 miles away, it was never used in Iraq.

Another U.S. munition, officially called the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP, is designed to penetrate hardened bunkers. At 30,000 pounds, it is even heavier than the MOAB but carries less explosive power.

A video released Friday by the Pentagon showed a GBU-43 striking a mountainsi­de overlookin­g a river valley with a giant blast that sent up a huge column of black smoke. The explosion was designed to send pulverizin­g pressure through the rocky labyrinth of tunnels, where Islamic State fighters were able to move without being detected by U.S. spy planes, U.S. officials said. Although powerful, the size of that explosion pales in comparison to that of a nuclear bomb.

As former U.S. Defense Secretary William Perry said on Twitter, “The #MOAB explosive yield is 0.011 kilotons, typical nuclear yield is 10-180 kilotons — the U.S. alone possesses over 7,000 nuclear weapons.”

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? An Afghan commando mans a machine gun at the Pandola village near the site of the U.S. forces’ Thursday bombing in Achin district of Jalalabad.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS An Afghan commando mans a machine gun at the Pandola village near the site of the U.S. forces’ Thursday bombing in Achin district of Jalalabad.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States