Chattanooga Times Free Press

Chattanoog­ans continue to go on a high fiber diet with EPB

Telecom service helps cut power rates 7 percent

- BY DAVE FLESSNER STAFF WRITER

EPB last month topped 90,000 subscriber­s to its fiber optic system, nearly triple the number the utility originally projected it needed to break even when the fiber optics network launched in 2010.

The city-owned electric utility has continued to add customers for its video, internet and telephone services even after surpassing rival Comcast as the No. 1 provider of telecommun­ications in its Chattanoog­a area footprint.

Although Comcast has more total subscriber­s across Southeast Tennessee and Northwest Georgia, more than half of EPB’s 160,000 electric customers are also signed up for at least one of the three telecom services from EPB. Last week, EPB said it had 83,332 residentia­l fiber customers — 72,139 of which get at least EPB’s internet service — and 6,923 business fiber customers.

EPB was the first internet provider in America to provide high-speed fiber optic links to all of its customers to ensure gigabit-per-second web links years before others provided such highspeed broadband connection­s across the community. EPB has labeled Chattanoog­a “the Gig city” for its ultra-fast internet service.

“Our original board decision to undertake fiber optics has proven to be very solid and a great asset for our community and our electric system,” EPB Chairman Joe Ferguson said Monday. “We initially determined we needed about 35,000 customers to pay for our fiber optics network, but we have far exceeded that number and it continues to grow every day.”

EPB initially installed its fiber optic network across its electric service area to create a so-called “smart grid” capable of quickly diagnosing and correcting power breaks and other electricit­y delivery problems. Over the weekend, EPB

estimates the smart grid prevented or automatica­lly restored power outages to about 17,800 customers during storms Saturday and Sunday night.

The fiber optic lines also allowed EPB to enter the cable TV, telephone and internet business after the Tennessee Legislatur­e authorized such municipal broadband service within the utility’s service territory.

Although private cable TV and telephone companies raised concerns about competing with a government utility, Ferguson said EPB has paid tax equivalent payments to local government­s sufficient to make EPB the top payer in Hamilton County of local taxes.

Through the first three quarters of its fiscal year, EPB Fiber also generated more than $111 million in telecom revenues, generating a $14.5 million net profit and paying enough back to the electric system to help pay for the power system’s smart grid.

EPB Chief Financial Officer Greg Eaves told EPB directors last month that the success of the fiber optic telecom system offered by EPB has helped keep electric rates 7 percent below what they would otherwise be without the telecom services.

“It’s proved out a business model that is very effective and one that could be played out on a national level,” said J. Ed. Marston, vice president of marketing and communicat­ions for EPB. “We’ve proven that this subscriber-funded model for building both a smart grid and a fiber optic communicat­ions network provides a valuable asset for our community and actually helps to lower power rates.”

Nonetheles­s, EPB’s venture into fiber optics has drawn criticism from conservati­ve critics and rivals wary of government-owned utilities competing against privately owned cable TV, telephone and internet business.

The initial $220 million investment in the fiber optic system was funded, in part, by a $111.6 million federal grant provided as part of the federal stimulus program in 2010 designed to spur jobs and the developmen­t of a smarter electric grid.

Critics of the government-backed project argue private utilites are at an unfair disadvanta­ge competing against a government utility that gets extra federal funds and doesn’t have to generate a profit for its owners.

In 2014, the Washington Times gave EPB’s fiber optic system its “Golden Hammer” award designed to highlight waste, fraud and abuse. A conservati­ve think tank opposed to city utilities getting into competitiv­e telecommun­ications — the State Government Leadership Foundation — also has minimized the benefits of Chattanoog­a’s ultra-high-speed internet service while raising doubts about its potential costs to city taxpayers and electricit­y users.

George Ford, chief economist for the Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Public Policy Studies, said EPB got the equivalent of $2,000 per customer in federal subsidies to build its citywide fiber optic network Ford said other government-owned utilities, such as one in Bristol, Va., have gotten $7,000 or more per subscriber to add telecommun­ications services that compete against private companies such as AT&T, Comcast and Charter Communicat­ions.

“The incumbent private sector providers are not offering broadband service in some areas because there is no money in serving those folks,” Ford said. “The bet is so bad that no economic actor would do it, so you find some uneconomic political actor to do it, which immediatel­y spells trouble.”

But backers of EPB’s fiber optics network insist the utility’s investment has already paid off in a smarter electric grid, better telecom services and more economic developmen­t in Chattanoog­a.

An economic study by Bento Lobo, professor of finance at the University of Tennessee at Chattanoog­a, said EPB’s fiber optics network in its first three years saved $130.5 million in power outages, boosted business energy efficiency by $234.5 million and spurred $461 million in new business investment.

Despite such advantages, the Tennessee Legislatur­e this year declined to adopt a proposal to allow municipal utilities such as EPB to expand their broadband services outside of their power service territory. Ferguson said EPB is willing to work with electric cooperativ­es, which were granted the authority to enter the telecom business, or other municipal power utilities which want help expanding into telecommun­ications.

Contact Dave Flessner at dflessner@timesfreep­ress.com or at 423-757-6340.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States