Chattanooga Times Free Press

WHAT RUSSIAN HACKING? WHAT RUSSIA?

-

It seems that we are watching the Trump administra­tion’s effort to obstruct justice unfold right before our eyes.

And Attorney General Jeff Sessions is smack in the middle of it.

One would think this should be a simple and overarchin­g matter: We must investigat­e the depth of the Russians’ meddling with our 2016 election, including asking whether that meddling involves collusion with any Americans.

But that’s not what we’re seeing. Instead, President Donald Trump, rather than acknowledg­e that America should get to the bottom of this, has called the whole thing a “hoax” and the investigat­ion “a witch hunt.”

Last week, former FBI Director Jim Comey testified that he was fired by the president after he resisted suggestion­s to give fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn a pass for lying about his Russia connection­s and conversati­ons. Comey added that Trump never once asked about the Russia meddling probe beyond a very initial briefing.

On Tuesday, Sessions acknowledg­ed that he’s never asked either.

“The only thing I know, I’ve read in the paper,” Sessions said. That might seem an appropriat­e answer about the collusion portion of the FBI’s and Senate Intelligen­ce Committee’s investigat­ion. After all, Sessions had to recuse himself from that portion of the government’s probe after he falsely volunteere­d in his confirmati­on hearing months ago that he’d not met with any Russians.

But it hardly seems appropriat­e that he would not even ask about the Russian hacking portion of the probe — the part that would deal with protecting American elections from Russians or others.

Sessions, by the way, had two meetings — perhaps a third, though he has “no recollecti­on” of that possible third — with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. One meeting was a private one-on-one meeting in his Senate office on Sept. 8. He later had to amend his confirmati­on testimony about those meetings.

And never mind that despite Sessions’ recusal from the collusion probe, he then participat­ed in the firing of the FBI director who was investigat­ing the matter.

But to hear Sessions tell it — with a air of righteous indignatio­n — he has done nothing wrong. He called the notion that he colluded with Russia a “detestable lie.” Further he added about his participat­ion in Comey’s firing: “It did not violate my recusal.”

He wouldn’t talk about what conversati­ons he had with Trump about Comey. He acknowledg­ed that he never talked with Comey about the so-called “problems” laid out in the firing memo — things like the FBI being “in disarray.” (Not that it really matters, since President Trump has acknowledg­ed the firing was because of “the Russia thing.”) Now one of Trump’s friends has told news outlets that Trump is contemplat­ing firing special counsel Robert Mueller, who was appointed to lead the FBI investigat­ion after Comey was fired.

You get the message: We the American people can see that there are white clouds in the blue sky and the sun rises every morning, but Sessions and Trump and others in the administra­tion,

as well as many other Republican­s, are telling us there are no clouds, there is no sky, and the sun never sets, let alone rises.

Meanwhile Tuesday, as Sessions danced around virtually every question asked of him citing “policy,” Bloomberg and other news organizati­ons were reporting that Russia’s cyberattac­k on the U.S. electoral system before Trump’s election was far more widespread than has been publicly revealed, “including incursions into voter databases and software systems” in 39 states.

Repeat: 39 states in America suffered Russian incursions into their voter databases and software systems in the summer and fall of 2016.

In Illinois, investigat­ors found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data, according to Bloomberg. The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state they accessed a campaign finance database.

Bloomberg writes that the scope and sophistica­tion so concerned the Obama administra­tion that officials took an unpreceden­ted step — complainin­g directly to Moscow over a modern-day “red phone,” warning the Kremlin that the attacks risked setting off a broader conflict.

After the warning, the hackers’ work still continued. According to a leaked NSA document, hackers working for Russian military intelligen­ce were trying to take over the computers of 122 local election officials just days before the Nov. 8 election.

The news of such widespread Russian interferen­ce — and Sessions’ stonewalli­ng — comes less than a week after Comey warned Congress that Moscow isn’t done meddling.

“They’re coming after America,” Comey told the same Senate Intelligen­ce Committee. “They will be back.”

Unfortunat­ely, the only thing the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee’s investigat­ion is thus far making clear is that the Trump crowd has no intention of being open and honest about it — let alone making a plan to stop it.

 ?? AL DRAGO/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Attorney General Jeff Sessions testifies Tuesday before the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee in Washington.
AL DRAGO/THE NEW YORK TIMES Attorney General Jeff Sessions testifies Tuesday before the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States