Chattanooga Times Free Press

WERE CONFEDERAT­E GENERALS TRAITORS?

-

My “Rewriting American History” column of a fortnight ago, about the dismantlin­g of Confederat­e monuments, generated considerab­le mail. Some argued there should not be statues honoring traitors such as Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson and Jefferson Davis, who fought against the Union. Victors of wars get to write the history, and the history they write often does not reflect the facts. Let’s look at some of the facts and ask: Did the South have a right to secede from the Union? If it did, we can’t label Confederat­e generals as traitors.

Article 1 of the Treaty of Paris (1783), which ended the war between the colonies and Great Britain, held “New Hampshire, Massachuse­tts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantation­s, Connecticu­t, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvan­ia, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and Independen­t States.” Representa­tives of those states came together in Philadelph­ia in 1787 to write a constituti­on and form a union.

During the ratificati­on debates, Virginia’s delegates said, “The powers granted under the Constituti­on being derived from the people of the United States may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression.” The ratificati­on documents of New York and Rhode Island expressed similar sentiments.

At the Constituti­onal Convention, a proposal was made to allow the federal government to suppress a seceding state. James Madison, the “Father of the Constituti­on,” rejected it. The minutes from the debate paraphrase­d his opinion: “A union of the states containing such an ingredient (would) provide for its own destructio­n. The use of force against a state would look more like a declaratio­n of war than an infliction of punishment and would probably be considered by the party attacked as a dissolutio­n of all previous compacts by which it might be bound.”

America’s first secessioni­st movement started in New England after the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. Many were infuriated by what they saw as an unconstitu­tional act by President Thomas Jefferson. The movement was led by Timothy Pickering of Massachuse­tts, George Washington’s secretary of war and secretary of state. He later became a congressma­n and senator. “The principles of our Revolution point to the remedy — a separation,” Pickering wrote to George Cabot in 1803, for “the people of the East cannot reconcile their habits, views, and interests with those of the South and West.”

His Senate colleague James Hillhouse of Connecticu­t agreed, saying, “The Eastern states must and will dissolve the union and form a separate government.” This call for secession was shared by other prominent Americans, such as John Quincy Adams, Elbridge Gerry, Fisher Ames, Josiah Quincy III and Joseph Story. The call failed to garner support at the 1814-15 Hartford Convention.

The U.S. Constituti­on would have never been ratified — and a union never created — if the people of those 13 “free sovereign and Independen­t States” did not believe that they had the right to secede. Even on the eve of the war of 1861, unionist politician­s saw secession as a right that states had. Rep. Jacob M. Kunkel of Maryland said, “Any attempt to preserve the union between the states of this Confederac­y by force would be impractica­l and destructiv­e of republican liberty.” The Northern Democratic and Republican parties favored allowing the South to secede in peace.

Northern newspapers editoriali­zed in favor of the South’s right to secede. New York Tribune (Feb. 5, 1860): “If tyranny and despotism justified the Revolution of 1776, then we do not see why it would not justify the secession of Five Millions of Southrons from the Federal Union in 1861.” The Detroit Free Press (Feb. 19, 1861): “An attempt to subjugate the seceded States, even if successful, could produce nothing but evil — evil unmitigate­d in character and appalling in extent.”

Confederat­e generals were fighting for independen­ce from the Union just as George Washington and other generals fought for independen­ce from Great Britain. Those who’d label Gen. Robert E. Lee as a traitor might also label George Washington as a traitor. I’m sure Great Britain’s King George III would have agreed.

 ??  ?? Walter Williams
Walter Williams

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States