Chattanooga Times Free Press

OVER DACA, A CASE OF TRUMP PANIC SYNDROME

-

The entire politico-media complex had a nervous breakdown last week over President Trump’s position on DACA.

Lawmakers, journalist­s and activists jumped to all sorts of conclusion­s when Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi announced that over dinner at the White House on Sept. 13 they reached an “agreement” with the president over the future of 700,000 illegal immigrants in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

There was reason to be skeptical — after all, the story was coming from just one side. But skepticism was in short supply, and even some of those who realized the informatio­n was sketchy couldn’t keep themselves from speaking up. Some Trump supporters instantly assumed the president had sold them out. Some Trump opponents instantly mocked Trump supporters for ever believing his promises. Democrats wondered what Schumer and Pelosi were doing with the hated president.

Many spoke without enough knowledge to draw any conclusion­s, or even early conclusion­s.

The two parties most to blame were Schumer/Pelosi and The Associated Press. After the White House dinner, the Democratic leaders released a statement saying of their meeting with the president, “We agreed to enshrine the protection­s of DACA into law quickly, and to work out a package of border security, excluding the wall, that’s acceptable to both sides.”

A reasonable reader would conclude that the two sides had reached a deal on DACA, with just the border security measures to be worked out later. But the AP took things a step further, suggesting a done deal. At 9:55 p.m. Sept. 13, the news agency tweeted: “BREAKING: Schumer, Pelosi announce deal with Trump to protect young immigrants; will include border security, but no wall.”

That was ahead of where things actually stood, but, coming from the AP, it was instantly accepted as fact. All hell broke loose.

Writing on the basis of the AP tweet, Republican Rep. Steve King, an immigratio­n hawk, tweeted, “If AP is correct, Trump base is blown up, destroyed, irreparabl­e, and disillusio­ned beyond repair. No promise is credible.”

Sean Hannity was skeptical, but still jumped in. Responding to a Twitter follower who said Trump is “really pissing off his base right now,” Hannity rushed to point the finger at the Republican Party. “If reports true 100%,” Hannity tweeted. “I blame R’s. They caused this. They wanted him to fail and now pushed him into arms of political suicide—IF TRUE.”

Meanwhile, as Twitter lit up, Pelosi sent a relatively subdued note to her House Democratic colleagues. At the White House meeting, she said, “We agreed to a plan to work out an agreement to protect our nation’s DREAMERs from deportatio­n.”

“Agreed to a plan to work out an agreement.” That’s a classic Washington way of saying the parties haven’t agreed on anything but agree to keep talking in hopes of eventually reaching an agreement.

That didn’t stop the ruckus. Nor did much change when, the next morning, Trump made an attempt to quiet things down. “No deal was made last night on DACA,” he tweeted. “Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Would be subject to vote.”

At the same time, Trump sounded positively Schumer-esque with another tweet asking, “Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplish­ed young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!” But even then, Trump said “BIG border security” would have to accompany legalizati­on.

On the night of Sept. 13 and the morning of the 14th, when hair was on fire across Washington and social media, there was no deal and nothing had been decided, except that everyone said they wanted a deal, which is what negotiator­s always say.

In other words, the whole episode changed pretty much nothing. Anyone who followed Trump during the campaign knows he is headed toward some sort of accommodat­ion for DACA recipients. And anyone who follows the Trump administra­tion and Congress knows there will be showdowns on Capitol Hill over the wall and other border security and enforcemen­t measures. That is where the DACA issue stood before the freakout of Wednesday night and Thursday morning, and that is where the issue stood afterward.

All that panic for no reason. People are on hair trigger these days. They go off before they know what is going on. The DACA fiasco should be a lesson.

Byron York is chief political correspond­ent for The Washington Examiner.

Andrews McMeel Syndicatio­n for UFS

 ??  ?? Byron York
Byron York

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States