Chattanooga Times Free Press

Black: ERs should be able to turn people away

- BY HOLLY FLETCHER USA TODAY NETWORK - TENNESSEE

U.S. Rep. Diane Black would like to see changes to a federal law to allow emergency department staff to turn patients away.

Black, a Republican gubernator­ial candidate and former nurse, said the federal Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act is a “burden” that took away clinicians’ ability to tell patients “an emergency room is not the proper place” for treatment.

The law requires ER staff to treat any patient regardless of ailment, ability to pay or other grounds of discrimina­tion.

“I would get rid of a law that says that you are not allowed, as a health care profession­al, to make that decision about whether someone can be appropriat­ely treated the next day, or at a walk-in clinic, or at their doctor,” Black, R-Gallatin, said in comments on MSNBC on Oct. 13.

Many people, particular­ly the poor, use ERs almost exclusivel­y, even though they are the most expensive places to treat many of those patients’ health problems.

Emergency department leaders want more people to use clinics or primary care providers. But they are apprehensi­ve about what any changes — including the ability to turn patients away — would mean to the one health care facility open to all, around the clock.

In a health care system designed for access with insurance or government­funded coverage, emergency rooms created assurances that people without those benefits still can get some type of care, said Nashville General Hospital CEO Joseph Webb, who called ERs a “piece of a right to care.”

“What people have learned to do is manipulate and take advantage of that little sliver of a right to health care,” Webb said. “In a perfect world, I’d probably try to figure out how we’re going to get health care to everyone as a right. See, the [emergency medical treatment] law was an attempt to create a right to health care at least on the emergency level.”

The 31-year-old federal law is a reflection of the nation’s health care system, and it’s not perfect, ER and hospital leaders say. It was passed to keep ERs from turning patients away and forcing them to other facilities because they couldn’t pay.

But implicatio­ns of a potential overhaul of the federal law intersects with the core of the ongoing national health care debate: Is health care a right or privilege and what happens to those who can’t pay?

Changing the law raises questions about logistics, ranging from transporta­tion to the alternativ­e source of care and how referrals to other facilities would work, as well as what it would mean for overall access to the health care system.

“I’m not saying [the law] is the absolute, most perfect requiremen­t,” said Dr. Corey Slovis, chairman of the department of emergency medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. “I am saying it protects patients and we need to be careful when we try to tinker with it or eliminate it.”

Here are some of the issues that Black’s comments raise:

CATCH-ALL TREATMENT

ERs are the first line of care for victims of accidents and violence, as well as a place where people with poorly managed chronic diseases come when complicati­ons flare — potentiall­y to dangerous levels.

On the other end of the spectrum, people walk into emergency rooms with sniffles, bumps and bruises and random pains to get checked out. Perhaps they don’t know where else to go, don’t have the money to pay or it’s after hours for clinics and doctors’ offices.

Sometimes it’s the place people go simply because they need a bed or haven’t eaten in three days, said Dr. Ali Bollinger, chief of emergency medicine at Saint Thomas Midtown, who oversees the system’s nine regional ERs.

“We’re really kind of a catch-all for the poorest people in the city,” she said.

A lot of people don’t have connection­s to a primary care group and want something that’s bothering them checked out.

“There’s a lot of anxiety people feel when they think they don’t have access to someone with answers,” Bollinger said. “For me, that’s a reason for them to come see me. They worry themselves sick, honestly.”

AVOIDABLE EMERGENCIE­S

Hospitals are trying different approaches to treating the types of patients who walk through the emergency room door. Both Nashville General and Williamson Medical Center — like many of their peers — have fasttrack areas for patients with simpler problems.

The colds and sniffles are not the burdens on the system, ER leaders say.

“It’s counterint­uitive. It seems so easy to say ‘just don’t let nonemergen­t cases go to the ER,’” Bollinger said. “What we’re spending our money on is patients who are chronicall­y unwell with multiple co-morbid conditions, who are basically sick all the time, who teeter on the edge of needing hospitaliz­ation.”

Webb wants more people better connected to primary care providers or clinics that can help educate about lifestyle, diet and taking proper medication­s so fewer people end up in the ER with “avoidable emergencie­s.”

All of Nashville’s major health systems have programs to connect people to a primary care practice. Getting people into an appointmen­t, or convincing them it might be affordable, is a challenge.

Webb said Nashville General is seeing fewer people coming to the ER with simple issues, such as colds, since making referrals to primary care clinics.

The ER still gets the people with complicati­ons from chronic disease.

“A large portion of what we see is avoidable but we don’t have really good infrastruc­ture in place to address these chronic conditions,” Webb said. “People don’t go out on their own to start learning about this stuff.”

Who makes the call to turn a patient away?

About half the people who come into Vanderbilt’s emergency room could have been seen by their own primary care provider. Or they could have received help sooner and cheaper in an urgent care or walk-in clinic, Slovis said.

EVADING CO-PAYS

ER chiefs want people to have access to urgent care, walk-in and neighborho­od clinics — and to know which one to choose when they need care.

Even if clinics peppered the countrysid­e, the ER would still be a destinatio­n for some. People know they will get to see a doctor at the ER, whereas an urgent care provider might be a physician’s assistant or a nurse practition­er.

“I think there’s enough [clinics] for those who have private health insurance, but the problem is we still have so many uninsured patients who are incapable of paying up front,” Bollinger said.

For many, it comes down to money.

Clinics and doctors’ offices almost always require payment or co-pay at the time of the visit.

ERs see patients regardless of insurance status or ability to pay, a critical difference that makes emergency department­s the go-to for those who don’t have money to pay for care.

“Individual­s need some assurance that regardless of anything else going on, when I go to the ER I will get some care,” Webb said. “If you don’t have the funds to pay it, then obviously you’re just not going to pay it. That’s what the system will determine as uncollecte­d, charity or bad debt.”

 ??  ?? Diane Black
Diane Black

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States