FBI renews inquiry into claims of corruption
WASHINGTON — FBI agents have renewed their inquiry into the Clinton Foundation amid calls from President Donald Trump and other top Republicans for the Justice Department to take another look at corruption allegations.
People familiar with the FBI’s steps said Friday agents have interviewed people connected to the foundation about whether donations were made in exchange for political favors while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.
Career prosecutors shut down that investigation in 2016 for lack of evidence.
During the presidential campaign, Trump branded his rival “Crooked Hillary” and promised to send her to jail if he won.
He briefly struck a more magnanimous tone after the election, however, and said he had no interest in pushing for a prosecution.
That has changed as Trump’s legal problems have mounted. With four former aides facing federal charges and a special prosecutor investigating him and his campaign, Trump has resumed his attack on his favorite target. He has openly called for Clinton to be investigated and one of her top aides to be imprisoned.
His calls break with long-standing presidential practice. Since the Watergate scandal, the Justice Department has conducted criminal investigations largely free of White House political influence. Trump, by contrast, has declared he has “absolute authority” over the Justice Department.
It is not clear exactly when the FBI renewed its interest in the Clinton Foundation, or whether agents were instructed by anyone in Washington to start investigating again.
The FBI’s decision to take additional investigative steps is sure to outrage Democrats who will see the investigation as an attempt by Attorney General Jeff Sessions to placate the president.
“Time after time, the Clinton Foundation has been subjected to politically motivated allegations, and time after time these allegations have been proven false,” Craig Minassian, a spokesman for the foundation, said in a statement.
Added Nick Merrill, a spokesman for Clinton: “Let’s call this what it is: A sham. This is a philanthropy that does lifechanging work, which Republicans have tried to turn into a political football. It’s disgraceful, and should be concerning to all Americans.”
The foundation has been a repeated target for Republicans. In 2015, conservative author Peter Schweizer published a book, “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.” The book was an investigation of donations made to the Clinton Foundation by foreign entities.
Schweizer is the president of the Government Accountability Institute, where Stephen Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist, was a founder and the executive chairman.
The Justice Department, in a letter sent in November to the House Judiciary Committee, said prosecutors would examine allegations that donations to the Clinton Foundation were tied to a 2010 decision by the Obama administration to allow a Russian nuclear agency to buy Uranium One, a company that owned access to uranium in the United States, and other issues.
The letter appeared to be a direct response to Trump’s statement days earlier that he was disappointed with Sessions for not investigating Hillary Clinton. An administration official said the FBI had taken investigative steps related to the foundation investigation before the Justice Department sent the letter to the judiciary committee.
In the letter, the Justice Department wrote that the attorney general had directed “senior prosecutors to evaluate certain issues.” Those prosecutors would make “recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a special counsel.”
Several FBI offices, including those in New York and Little Rock, Ark., had been investigating the foundation. At the direction of Mark F. Giuliano, then deputy director of the FBI, the investigations were consolidated at FBI headquarters in Washington and placed under the supervision of career public integrity prosecutors.
The decision by senior FBI officials and prosecutors not to move forward with the case angered some agents while others believed there was little evidence to support more aggressive steps during a presidential campaign.