Chattanooga Times Free Press

Not all sexual misdeeds are unforgivab­le

- BY MICHAEL GOTLIEB

The current flood of sexual-harassment allegation­s has toppled — deservedly — high-powered businessme­n, accomplish­ed actors and seasoned politician­s. One aspect of legitimate­ly bringing sexual harassers to light, however, has been overlooked: the ability to forgive genuinely repentant wrongdoers.

It’s perhaps unusual that a Jew, let alone a rabbi, would quote Christian Scripture, but the message found in Matthew 6:14 couldn’t be more relevant: “If you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you.”

Granted, life doesn’t always lend itself to a theologica­l quid pro quo. Forgive and be forgiven, offer an apology and be absolved won’t work under all circumstan­ces, even when the apology is genuinely tendered.

Some transgress­ions are morally unpardonab­le. Murder is chief among them for the simple reason that the victim is not alive to grant forgivenes­s. Preying on a minor, especially a very young child, is an irredeemab­le act. Never again can a child’s innocence be restored. The psychologi­cal harm caused is devastatin­g.

Rape and irreversib­le bodily damage are other examples. The physical and emotional scars usually remain for a lifetime.

That said, not all unwelcome carnal advances are equal to rape or pedophilia. How a victim reacts to any kind of sexual abuse or harassment is personal. What might prove to be unforgivab­le and endlessly traumatic to one may be forgivable to another.

The current rush to assign the same degree of seriousnes­s to every accusation is troubling. It is morally confusing and intellectu­ally narrow. It cheapens what are clearly the most aggressive and disturbing accusation­s of sexual misconduct. We’re in trouble if we can no longer distinguis­h between an unwelcome touch, kiss or suggestive comment — as unacceptab­le as they are — and far more severe sexual indiscreti­ons.

This lack of nuance undermines our shared spiritual and human duty to forgive. We are reaching a point where we can’t permit even less serious transgress­ors to offer an honest apology and receive pardon. Lesser misconduct, in which the offender is deeply ashamed and sincerely repentant, eager never again to repeat his past behavior, should be forgiven. Such miscreants don’t deserve unending shame and public disgrace.

In my religious tradition, Yom Kippur is a day filled with fasting and introspect­ion, 24 hours dedicated to requesting and granting forgivenes­s. The message of the Day of Atonement is timeless: Those wishing forgivenes­s for the forgivable wrongs they’ve committed have the potential to be pardoned.

Consistent with Jewish thought, neither God nor any other intermedia­ry can reconcile a wrong on the perpetrato­r’s behalf. The person who carried out the misdeed must seek absolution from the aggrieved party.

Releasing others from their trespass is often as difficult as atoning and seeking pardon. Holding back forgivenes­s is empowering. It’s the reverse of being dominated, of being made to feel vulnerable. When the roles are upended, the person who refuses to forgive is no longer the victim; the one held in contempt is.

Men of status and influence have taken advantage of untold numbers of women. They thought they could get away with their abusive behavior or, worse, they didn’t even consider it abuse. To the women who suffered in silence, a desire for revenge is a visceral, understand­able reaction.

Granting forgivenes­s, when possible, is not the same as forgetting the incident. No one should expect a victim of sexual harassment to forget the outrage inflicted on her. Neither should the reformed harasser forget his earlier behavior. By rememberin­g, we grow and, ideally, improve. By analyzing past deeds, we can amend our ways and become more decent.

We can never know the extent to which anyone is genuinely repentant. But here are three possible indicators of a transforme­d soul. The offender acts differentl­y in a later, similar situation. His apology doesn’t rationaliz­e or explain away past behavior. He willingly seeks psychologi­cal or moral-religious help.

We are witnessing a watershed cultural moment. Women — and men — who have been sexually victimized are silent no more. Their public stories are forewarnin­g others and bringing to justice abusers.

These individual­s are brave indeed. But braver still are those who can forgive their tormentors, under circumstan­ces that justify it.

Michael Gotlieb is the rabbi at Kehillat Ma’arav, the Westside Congregati­on, in Santa Monica, California. He wrote this for the Los Angeles Times.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States