Chattanooga Times Free Press

Congress sees boost for a deal

- BY ANDREW TAYLOR AND ALAN FRAM

WASHINGTON — Backed by the White House, Democratic and Republican lawmakers dug into a politicall­y fraught search for compromise on immigratio­n Wednesday, seeking to take advantage of a window of opportunit­y opened by President Donald Trump. They’re under pressure to find a breakthrou­gh before a deadline next week that could lead to a government shutdown neither side wants.

Democrats want urgent action to stave off deportatio­n of some 800,000 immigrants currently protected by an Obama-era program called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. Trump still wants his border wall, though he’s toned down what that means. Conservati­ves are watching with a wary eye, fearing he will strike a soft compromise that could infuriate their — and his — political base heading into this year’s elections.

The No. 2 lawmakers of each of Capitol Hill’s quadrants of power — Republican­s and Democrats in both House and Senate — touched gloves Wednesday afternoon, deputized for action at what appears to be a moment of genuine opportunit­y to break Washington gridlock.

“Everybody wants to find a deal there, myself included,” said Republican Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina, chairman of the stoutly conservati­ve House Freedom Caucus. “It better be good, because that particular issue is really one of the issues that got this president elected. He can’t afford to make a mistake.”

The Democrats talk most about DACA, the program protecting immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children and are now here illegally. Many have only known America as their home and are viewed sympatheti­cally in opinion polls and among most lawmakers.

Meanwhile, Republican­s are heartened by an agreement to discuss other issues, such as border security and Trump’s long-promised wall, as well as limiting a preferenti­al “chain migration” system that gives advantages to the relatives of legal immigrants.

Trump no longer talks about the “big, beautiful wall” spanning the length of the U.S.-Mexico border, as he did in the election campaign, but he is demanding some elements of it as part of any agreement.

“We need the wall for security, we need the wall for safety, we need the wall for stopping the drugs from pouring in,” Trump said Wednesday. “Any solution has to include the wall because without the wall, it all doesn’t work.”

Outside of Washington, conservati­ve columnist and author Ann Coulter warned Trump after a White House meeting on Tuesday in which he struck a conciliato­ry chord on immigratio­n.

“As he considers the utility of walls (and promises), realDonald­Trump should consider that ‘Never Trump’ was toothless, but ‘Former Trump’ will bite,” Coulter wrote on Twitter.

But inside the Capitol among the GOP rank and file, most seem to be either supportive of the negotiatio­ns or taking a wait and see approach. Everyone has long known that bipartisan talks on both immigratio­n and increasing the crunching spending limits on both the Pentagon and domestic agencies were inevitable. It’s no secret that the results of the bipartisan, leadership-driven negotiatio­ns are likely to produce results that anger the hard right, but less strident Republican­s seem to be comfortabl­e, at least so far.

“I think most like where it’s going,” said freshman Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, who represents a competitiv­e district anchored by Omaha and is sympatheti­c to DACA immigrants. “There’s some exceptions but there’s a general consensus that that is what we need to be doing. And I think that this is an area that’s tailor-made for a bipartisan solution. We both want some things here.”

Immigratio­n is just one side of the equation. Also at stake is a deal on spending that would uncork tens of billions of dollars in higher Pentagon spending this year alone, along with money sought by Democrats for domestic programs. Democratic votes are needed to advance such legislatio­n, but top Democrats including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York won’t agree to a budget deal unless DACA is dealt with first.

Republican­s had long fought perception­s that the two issues were tied together, but they’re dropping that pretense now.

“When it comes to how conservati­ves react to the notion that these things are being linked in discussion­s, it’s sort of nothing new,” said Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida. “I think a lot of folks want to see the final product, but I haven’t heard some wide-scale revolt to the fact that people are having discussion­s.”

Conservati­ves in the think tank world said they were heartened that the negotiatio­ns had broadened to so-called chain migration and an immigratio­n lottery that’s aimed at promoting diversity.

“I think that for some people, yesterday was a bit of a shock to see just how eager [Trump] is to pass amnesty,” said Roy Beck, executive director of NumbersUSA, which advocates for reduced immigratio­n rates. “We were worried that the wall was going to be the big get. … I think we’re thrilled to be in as good a shape as we’re in.”

Still, frustratio­n is brewing that Republican­s aren’t doing better after winning control of the White House and Congress in 2016,

“Somehow Chuck Schumer still gets to dictate, ‘Oh, I get $60 billion more in non-defense spending, and I get to determine … DACA,’” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio. “How does that make any sense?”

 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., left, and Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md. listen as President Donald Trump speaks Tuesday during a meeting with lawmakers on immigratio­n policy in the Cabinet Room of the White House.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., left, and Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md. listen as President Donald Trump speaks Tuesday during a meeting with lawmakers on immigratio­n policy in the Cabinet Room of the White House.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States