Chattanooga Times Free Press

Ohio opioid woes one reason for drug lawsuits

- BY ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The role drugmakers and drug distributo­rs played in contributi­ng to the nation’s deadly opioid epidemic is now front and center in a federal courtroom in Cleveland.

Judge Dan Polster is overseeing more than 200 lawsuits against drug companies brought by local communitie­s across the country, including those in California, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia. The lawsuits have been consolidat­ed into what is known as “multidistr­ict litigation,” an approach taken when lawsuits of a similar nature are filed around the country.

The consolidat­ion comes in the midst of the most widespread and deadly drug crisis in the nation’s history. The government tallied 63,600 overdose drug deaths in 2016, another record. Most of the deaths involved prescripti­on opioids such as OxyContin or Vicodin or related illicit drugs such as heroin and fentanyl.

A look at the lawsuits and the consolidat­ion process:

HOW CASES ARE CHOSEN FOR CONSOLIDAT­ION

Congress created the Judicial Panel on Multidistr­ict Litigation 50 years ago this year. The panel’s responsibi­lities are determinin­g whether civil lawsuits pending around the country are similar enough to be combined, and to select a judge or judges to oversee them. Consolidat­ed cases can involve airplane crashes, train wrecks or hotel fires, or lawsuits over defective products, such as lawsuits consolidat­ed in Miami recently against Japanese auto-parts supplier Takata over its air bag inflators.

WHY CONSOLIDAT­E CASES IN OHIO

The panel cited three reasons in its decision last month to center the cases in Cleveland. First is Ohio’s own experience with overdose deaths and attempts to slow the epidemic. In 2016, a record 4,050 Ohioans died of overdoses, a number expected to rise again for 2017. Next is Cleveland’s proximity to various drugmakers’ headquarte­rs in Connecticu­t, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvan­ia, and Ohio, which is home to drug distributo­r Cardinal Health. Finally, the panel cited Polster’s experience on a previous consolidat­ed case involving damage claims related to dyes used in magnetic resonance imaging procedures. That case, which involved several hundred cases, “has provided him valuable insight into the management of complex, multidistr­ict litigation,” the panel ruled. Polster was nominated in 1997 by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, and confirmed and sworn in as judge in 1998.

WHO IS SUING?

The communitie­s suing are cities or counties adversely affected by the opioid crisis. Municipali­ties added to the case last week include Guayanilla in Puerto Rico, Jefferson Davis County in Mississipp­i and the city of New Castle, Ind. Other communitie­s include hard-hit cities such as Portsmouth, Ohio and Huntington, W.Va., and Henderson County in Kentucky. Polster’s courtroom isn’t the only place where lawsuits are being heard against drugmakers. Some government bodies, including Ohio and at least nine other states, are suing the industry in state courts. Additional­ly, most states have joined a multistate investigat­ion of the industry that could end up sparking a settlement or yet more litigation against the industry.

WHAT THE LAWSUITS ALLEGE

The lawsuits accuse drugmakers of using deceptive marketing to push the sale of opioids and targeted painkiller­s at vulnerable population­s such as the elderly and veterans. Allegation­s against distributo­rs accuse them of lax product oversight and of ignoring suspicious orders of large quantities of painkiller­s. Targets of the lawsuits include drugmakers such as Allergan, Johnson & Johnson, and Purdue Pharma, and the three large drug distributi­on companies, Amerisourc­e Bergen, Cardinal Health and McKesson. Drug distributo­rs and manufactur­ers named in those and other lawsuits have said they don’t believe litigation is the answer but have pledged to help solve the crisis.

LAWSUIT DURATION

Such lawsuits with multiple jurisdicti­ons can drag on for years, although one goal of consolidat­ion is to cut down on redundant filings that can lead to delays. Polster has said he wants to move quickly, noting hundreds of people would die in the U.S. from overdoses just during a Jan. 9 hearing.

“My objective is to do something meaningful to abate this crisis and do it in 2018,” Polster said, adding: “With all these smart people here and their clients I’m confident we can do something to dramatical­ly reduce the number of opioids that are being disseminat­ed, manufactur­ed and distribute­d.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States