Chattanooga Times Free Press

TRUMP’S RUSSIA HOAX IS ON US

-

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., on Friday summed up the vastly overrated Nunes memo.

He tweeted: “The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests — no party’s, no president’s, only Putin’s.”

Of course, that was just the snippet lifted for Twitter from McCain’s longer and more complete reaction.

“The American people deserve to know all of the facts surroundin­g Russia’s ongoing efforts to subvert our democracy, which is why Special Counsel Mueller’s investigat­ion must proceed unimpeded. Our nation’s elected officials, including the president, must stop looking at this investigat­ion through the warped lens of politics and manufactur­ing partisan sideshows. If we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin’s job for him.”

THE NUNES BACKFIRE

Interestin­gly, the Nunes memo — aimed to tarnish the probe’s legitimacy by pushing a narrative that surveillan­ce abuses by the FBI against Vladimir Putin fan Carter Page were fanned by the Steele dossier and kicked off the whole Russia investigat­ion — actually seems to show just the opposite.

Two sentences near the end of the memo go like this: “The Page FISA applicatio­n also mentions informatio­n regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoul­os, but there is no evidence of any cooperatio­n or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoul­os. The Papadopoul­os informatio­n triggered the opening of an FBI counterint­elligence investigat­ion in late July 2016 … ”

The Washington Post notes that Democrats seized on the passage that confirms for the first time that it was Papadopoul­os, not Page, that set the FBI’s counterint­elligence investigat­ion in motion. Papadopoul­os in October became the first person to plead guilty in Mueller’s probe, and he is now a cooperatin­g witness.

The Papadopoul­os passage shows that the Russia investigat­ion would be underway with or without the surveillan­ce of Page, and — more critically — even if the government had never seen a dossier of informatio­n about Trump that was compiled by Christophe­r Steele, a former British spy whose research was funded first by a Republican candidate then by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

Furthermor­e, Papadopoul­ous came to the attention of authoritie­s not thanks to FISA or Steele. Rather, intelligen­ce agents from a second U.S. ally, Australia, told American authoritie­s about a drunken conversati­on Papadopoul­os carried on with an Australian diplomat in a London bar in May 2016. Papadopoul­os bragged that he’d been told the Russians had emails that would be damaging to Clinton.

“The authors of the GOP memo would like the country to believe that the investigat­ion began with Christophe­r Steele and the dossier, and if they can just discredit Mr. Steele, they can make the whole investigat­ion go away regardless of the Russians’ interferen­ce in our election or the role of the Trump campaign in that interferen­ce,” Democrats on the House Intelligen­ce Committee wrote in response to the Nunes memo. “This ignores the inconvenie­nt fact that the investigat­ion did not begin with, or arise from Christophe­r Steele or the dossier, and that the investigat­ion would persist on the basis of wholly independen­t evidence had Christophe­r Steele never entered the picture,” the Democrats added.

By the way, Papadopoul­os is not mentioned anywhere in the 16 reports that make up the Steele dossier.

AND THE RUSSIANS FEEL THE LOVE

Meanwhile, Vladimir Putin keeps laughing. Again, we quote Sen. John McCain.

“In 2016, the Russian government engaged in an elaborate plot to interfere in an American election and undermine our democracy. Russia employed the same tactics it has used to influence elections around the world, from France and Germany to Ukraine, Montenegro, and beyond. Putin’s regime launched cyberattac­ks and spread disinforma­tion with the goal of sowing chaos and weakening faith in our institutio­ns. And while we have no evidence that these efforts affected the outcome of our election, I fear they succeeded in fueling political discord and dividing us from one another.”

What do we have to show for American security, resistance, retaliatio­n or payback nearly two years later? Nothing.

Nothing save a president and GOP intent on ignoring it. Trump praises Putin, calls the meddling “a hoax” and blatantly ignores a bipartisan law that he establish new sanctions against the country that conducted cyberattac­ks on us and most certainly will do so again in 2018. And the cowed GOP condones it.

On Monday, just ahead of the deadline for imposing sanctions, Trump’s State Department announced it would not impose the sanctions Congress overwhelmi­ngly passed in mid-2017. A State Department official said there is no need for new sanctions “because the legislatio­n is, in fact, serving as a deterrent.”

Huh? For starters, the bill that passed the Senate last summer 98-2 and passed by the House 419-3 was titled “Countering America’s Adversarie­s Through Sanctions Act.” It was intended to punish, not deter. Secondly, just hours before the State Department said there would be no sanctions, CIA Director Mike Pompeo said that Russia hadn’t really scaled back its election interferen­ce efforts. In fact, Pompeo said: “I have every expectatio­n that they will continue to try” to meddle in U.S. elections.

But wait, there’s more. On Friday, Bloomberg reported that a U.S. Treasury Department report now warns that Russia’s sovereign debt market “is too important to sanction” without risking global financial turmoil. Bloomberg termed the announceme­nt a “signal” that the Trump administra­tion is wary of targeting Russia for penalties.

Trump’s Russia “hoax” is on us.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States