Chattanooga Times Free Press

WHY BE AFRAID OF WORK?

-

What have Democrats got against work? Legislatio­n was approved in a Tennessee House subcommitt­ee Wednesday that would direct the state Department of Finance and Administra­tion to seek a federal waiver in order to impose work requiremen­ts on able-bodied, working-age adults without dependent children under 6 who are TennCare beneficiar­ies.

But Democrats squawked as if the measure were asking folks to walk into a burning building.

They’re trying “to kick people off” TennCare (the state’s Medicaid program), state Rep. John Ray Clemons, D-Nashville, said.

“Part of the problem” is moving “so quickly to get rid of people” on TennCare, state Rep. JoAnne Favors, D-Chattanoog­a, said.

In truth, there’s nothing “quickly” about it. The legislatio­n is only seeking the federal waiver under a new policy issued in January by the Trump administra­tion.

Should the waiver be granted, a new measure would be needed to determine who would qualify (some 58,000-87,000 people out of some 1.3 million on TennCare) and whether work, volunteer work and/or school would satisfy the weekly 20-hour requiremen­ts.

We don’t believe Republican­s are trying to kick people off TennCare, but healthy, working-age beneficiar­ies should only be looking at the program as a stopgap between jobs in the first place and not as a health care hammock.

Similar requiremen­ts were reinstitut­ed this month in most of the state’s counties by Gov. Haslam for able-bodied adults without dependents who receive Supplement­al Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly known as food stamps) benefits. The work had been previously required but was discontinu­ed during the Great Recession.

House Speaker Beth Harwell, R-Nashville, who sponsored the TennCare legislatio­n, said it is an effort to lift people out of poverty.

We think if it serves as a prod to get people in school, to help their community by volunteeri­ng, or to go to work (or back to work), so be it. During the recovery from the recession, many able-bodied people left the job force because they couldn’t get the full-time work they were trained for and didn’t want to take just any part-time work. With the economy in a much better position today, their job prospects should be considerab­ly brighter.

Legislator­s are rightly concerned about the cost of such legislatio­n if a waiver is granted but differ as to how much that cost would be or should be, based on a similar federal waiver approval for Kentucky.

One thing at a time, though, Democrats. Until the waiver is granted, the minimal work requiremen­ts need not be feared.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States