Chattanooga Times Free Press

Right-to-die restrictio­n poses dilemma for vets

- BY JULIE WATSON

SAN DIEGO — Suffering from heart problems, Bob Sloan told his children he wants to use California’s new law allowing life-ending drugs for the terminally ill when his disease becomes too advanced to bear.

But then the 73-year-old former U.S. Army sergeant learned that because he lives at the Veterans Home of California at Yountville — the nation’s largest retirement home for veterans — he must first move out.

Veterans in government-run homes in many parts of the country that have legalized physician-assisted death, including Colorado, Vermont and Washington, D.C., are finding similar restrictio­ns because assisted suicide goes against the policy of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Veterans such as Sloan said relocating would cause undue hardship during an already painful time. Veterans living at the Yountville home raised the issue in recent weeks with California lawmakers, and one organizati­on is considerin­g taking legal action if the regulation stays in place.

“I should be able to die peacefully in my home, and this is my home,” Sloan said of Yountville, where he has lived since 2013. “If I’m in that state or condition, why should I be forced to move to make use of what has been changed into law? It just doesn’t make sense.”

Doctors also can legally prescribe lethal medication for terminally ill patients in Oregon and Washington. Veteran homes in those states do not require the person be discharged to take the drugs, though staff cannot be involved, and no federal funds can be used. Montana’s state Supreme Court ruled in 2009 that doctors could use a patient’s request for life-ending medication as a defense against criminal charges.

Opponents said the option could lead to hasty decisions, misdiagnos­is and coercion.

Regardless of state laws, the 1997 Assisted Suicide Funding Restrictio­n Act passed by Congress prohibits the use of federal funds for assisted suicides, Veterans Affairs spokesman Curt Cashour said. The VA provides many state homes with money for veterans’ care, including the doctors. It leaves it to states to decide their own regulation­s regarding the homes.

The funding restrictio­n act is the only federal law regarding the issue. The Supreme Court has left it to states to enact legislatio­n permitting or prohibitin­g physician-assisted deaths.

After California’s law took effect in 2016, California’s Department of Veterans Affairs, or CalVet, mandated the discharge of residents intending to consume medication to achieve a peaceful death and barred any employees, independen­t contractor­s or anyone else from participat­ing in any activities under the End of Life Option Act while on the premises of one of its homes. If a veteran decides not to go through with it, the person will be re-admitted immediatel­y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States