Chattanooga Times Free Press

WHY CHRISTIANS STICKING WITH TRUMP

- Marc Thiessen

WASHINGTON — As “60 Minutes” prepares to air its interview with adult-film actress Stormy Daniels, conservati­ve Christians are being accused of hypocrisy. How can so-called “values voters” continue to stand with President Trump despite revelation­s that he allegedly had affairs with a porn star and a Playboy model, and paid them for their silence?

No doubt some Christian leaders have gone too far in rationaliz­ing Trump’s past personal behavior and excusing his offensive comments while in office. He is a deeply flawed man. But Trump does have one moral quality that deserves admiration: He keeps his promises.

During the 2016 campaign, Trump pledged to defend religious liberty, stand up for unborn life and appoint conservati­ve jurists to the Supreme Court and federal appeals courts. And he has done exactly what he promised. That is more important to most Christian conservati­ves than what the president may have done with a porn actress more than 10 years ago.

Trump’s election came as religious liberty was under unpreceden­ted attack. The Obama administra­tion was trying to force the Little Sisters of the Poor to violate their religious conscience and facilitate payment for abortifaci­ent drugs and other contracept­ives. During oral arguments in the Obergefell v. Hodges case, President Barack Obama’s solicitor general told the Supreme Court that churches and universiti­es could lose their tax-exempt status if they opposed same-sex marriage.

Hillary Clinton promised to escalate those attacks. In 2015, she declared at the Women in the World Summit that “religious beliefs … have to be changed” — perhaps the most radical threat to religious liberty ever delivered by a major presidenti­al candidate.

The impact would have been immediate, as the court prepares to decide two cases crucial to religious liberty. In Masterpiec­e Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the Court will soon determine whether the government can compel a U.S. citizen to violate his conscience and participat­e in speech that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs. In National Institute of Family Life Advocates v. Becerra, the Court will decide whether the state of California can compel prolife crisis pregnancy centers to advertise access to abortion to their clients, in violation of their conscience. Those cases are being heard not by five liberals, but five conservati­ves, including Justice Neil M. Gorsuch — because Trump kept his promise to “appoint justices to the Supreme Court who will strictly interpret the Constituti­on and not legislate from the bench.”

The president is moving at record pace to fill the federal appeals courts with young conservati­ve judges who will protect life and religious freedom for decades.

Trump ordered the creation of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division at the Department of Health and Human Services to protect the civil rights of doctors, nurses and other health care workers who refuse to take part in procedures such as abortion, reversing an Obama-era policy that required them to do so.

The president has been a pro-life champion. He became the first president to address the March for Life when he spoke by satellite video from the White House’s Rose Garden.

Indeed, Trump has arguably done more in his first year in office to protect life and religious freedom than any modern president. Little wonder that religious conservati­ves stick with him despite the Daniels revelation­s. This is not to say that Christians don’t think a culture of fidelity is important. But the culture of life is important too.

No one upholds Trump as moral exemplar. He is not the most religious president we have ever had, but he may be the most pro-religion president. Christian conservati­ves are judging Trump not by his faith, but by his works. And when it comes to life and liberty, his works are good.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States