Chattanooga Times Free Press

BACK TO THE CONSTITUTI­ON

- TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY

The retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy from the U.S. Supreme Court is about to bring a 60-year battle to a head.

For decades the country has witnessed a fight between those who believe the Constituti­on speaks for itself and others who believe it says whatever the judges think it says, or even should say. Already, the left is apoplectic. Fundraisin­g letters are going out. Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., sent one within minutes of Kennedy’s retirement announceme­nt and Chris Matthews went ballistic on MSNBC, all but forecastin­g the end of the world as we know it.

A few examples will suffice to preview coming distractio­ns from the central issue. Among the printable ones is this over-the-top comment by the Rev. Al Sharpton: “All civil and human rights are at stake.”

Journalist/author Molly Knight fired off this incendiary tweet: “How very cool of Justice Kennedy to pour kerosene on the current dumpster fire that is America. The Roe v Wade riots should provide fine entertainm­ent for him in his retirement.” Riots?

There’s more, including abundant use of the left’s favorite “F-word,” but you get the idea. Legal Armageddon is about to arrive.

Since the Warren Court decided praying to an authority higher than the state was unconstitu­tional and Bible reading in public schools was not what the founders had in mind when writing the First Amendment, there has been a pitched battle for control of the Supreme Court. The left has used federal judges to engineer society in ways it could not have done, and probably would not have tried, through the legislativ­e process while conservati­ves have fought to prevent the court from exceeding its constituti­onal role by making law.

Abraham Lincoln said it well when he noted: “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constituti­on but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constituti­on.” The belief that government and the courts have become our masters has propelled conservati­ve opposition to both legislatin­g courts and big government.

The late Justice Antonin Scalia summed up the conservati­ve view of the Constituti­on when he said, “It means, today, not what current society, much less the court, thinks it ought to mean, but what it meant when it was adopted.”

Two former justices gave the liberal view of the Constituti­on. Oliver Wendell Holmes said: “The provisions of the Constituti­on are not mathematic­al formulas having their essence in their form; they are organic, living institutio­ns transplant­ed from English soil. Their significan­ce is vital, not formal; it is to be gathered not simply by taking the words and a dictionary, but by considerin­g their origin and the line of their growth.”

From this came the notion of a “living Constituti­on,” which leads to the assertion by the late Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes that “… the Constituti­on is what the judges say it is.”

President Trump and the Republican Senate have an opportunit­y to reverse decades of wrongful constituti­onal decision-making. From his list of 25 conservati­ve candidates for Kennedy’s seat, he must choose a nominee quickly so the Senate can take it up before Democrats and their media allies can become fully mobilized.

If the president selects someone with Judge Neil Gorsuch’s credential­s, the left will have a difficult time opposing the candidate, though they will certainly try and make accusation­s that have no merit.

In 2009, President Obama delivered a blunt message to Republican­s, in essence telling them, I won, you lost. Get over it. Well, we also had an election in 2016. President Trump won. Democrats and the left should get over it.

 ??  ?? Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States