Chattanooga Times Free Press

Collective action complaint filed

- BY ROSANA HUGHES STAFF WRITER

A collective action complaint filed Friday against Volkswagen alleges the company engaged in companywid­e age discrimina­tion against employees over the age of 50.

The complaint, filed in federal court, comes after a June 2017 news release announcing the company would make management changes to reduce the size and age of its staff by implementi­ng a “partial early retirement scheme for employees born between 1955 and 1960.”

“We are becoming slimmer, leaner and younger,” Volkswagen AG Chief Executive Herbert Diess said in the 2017 statement. “This will make Volkswagen faster and more efficient at the same time as providing new motivation for junior managers.”

In the complaint filed Friday, plaintiff Jonathan Manlove, 60, is bringing the suit on behalf of himself and similarly situated U.S. employees of Volkswagen AG and its subsidiari­es, according to a news release from his legal team.

“Volkswagen’s actions — publicly directed by German parent company Volkswagen AG — indisputab­ly violate the Age Discrimina­tion in Employment Act and Tennessee Human Rights Act,” according to the complaint.

Manlove is a former supervisor in Volkswagen’s Chattanoog­a auto manufactur­ing facility. Three days after the company issued the 2017 news release, he was informed by human resources that he would be demoted from assistant manager to supervisor, the position he had when he joined the company in 2011, the complaint alleges. He was also transferre­d “on loan” to a position in a different department.

A human resources representa­tive told Manlove he had one year to find a new assistant manager position within Volkswagen or his salary would be reduced, and his demotion and “on loan” status would become permanent, which could result in the loss of his company car.

But he was allegedly prevented from applying for any promotions, despite his manager recommendi­ng him for a promotion after a performanc­e evaluation, according to the complaint.

Human resources reviews each performanc­e evaluation and issues a final evaluation. The complaint alleges Manlove’s assignment of “vertical” advancemen­t status was changed to a “remain in position,” preventing him from applying for any other position within the company for the next year.

A human resource representa­tive later told Manlove that his advancemen­t status had been entered in error, the complaint alleges. And while the company claimed to change his status to vertical, he was assigned a three-year status of “remain in position,” meaning he is still ineligible for a promotion.

A Volkswagen representa­tive declined to comment Friday, noting the company cannot comment on pending litigation.

“The clock is ticking for Jonathan, and his efforts to undo his discrimina­tory demotion have not been successful,” Leigh Anne St. Charles, a member of Manlove’s legal team, said in a statement. “No monetary compensati­on is at stake for him or members of the class. He is a talented American auto worker who simply wants to continue performing the work at VW he is most capable of doing at a salary commensura­te with his considerab­le training, skills, and experience.”

The complaint requests a jury trial and seeks injunctive relief for Manlove and others like him, including preventing Volkswagen from making his demotion permanent, requiring the company to restore his former title and work responsibi­lities, and preventing Volkswagen from discrimina­ting against other older workers in the future.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States