Chattanooga Times Free Press

Amazon reaches $1 trillion in value

- BY JOSEPH PISANI AND MARLEY JAY

NEW YORK — Amazon on Tuesday became the second publicly traded company to reach $1 trillion in market value, hot on the heels of iPhone maker Apple.

The milestone is another sign of Amazon’s swift rise from an online bookseller to a behemoth that sells toilet paper, TVs and just about anything. In its two decades, Amazon has expanded far beyond online shopping and into health care, advertisin­g and cloud computing.

Its growth has boosted the fortunes of its founder and CEO, Jeff Bezos. His 16 percent stake in Amazon is now worth more than $160 billion. Forbes magazine placed him at the top of its list of billionair­es for the first time this year, surpassing Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates and investor Warren Buffett.

Amazon’s stock has increased almost 600 percent in the past five years, including

and the communitie­s they represent and speak to,” including the athletes.

“Even in the face of potential backlash, they support their athlete partners, and that’s an incredibly powerful statement to the athlete community,” Gordon said.

Other athletes in the campaign include tennis star Serena Williams, New York Giants wide receiver Odell Beckham Jr. and Shaquem Griffin, a linebacker whose left hand was amputated when he was 4. But the Kaepernick ad struck a nerve, timed just before the NFL season kicks off Thursday.

Nike did not return a request for comment about its strategy

Neil Saunders, managing director of the data and analytics firm GlobalData, called the Kaepernick strategy “commercial­ly imprudent.”

“Nike’s campaign will generate both attention and discussion which is, arguably, one of its central aims,” he said. “However, it is also a risky strategy in that it addresses, and appears to take sides on, a highly politicize­d issue. This means it could ultimately alienate and lose customers, which is not the purpose of a marketing campaign.”

But other experts think the strength of Nike’s brand will help it weather this particular storm and perhaps benefit from it, too. Nike is one of the world’s largest sports apparel companies, with $34.5 billion in revenue last year.

“What you stand for is almost as important as what you make,” BrandSimpl­e marketing consultant Allen Adamson said. “It’s a polarized marketplac­e. No matter what you do, you offend some people. They’re focused on what they stand for, and if that upsets some users, so be it.”

Robert Passikoff, founder of marketing consultanc­y Brand Keys, said an ad such as Nike’s will divide people, but the outrage won’t last.

“My guess is that the audience that is reacting so badly to this aren’t buying a lot of Nikes anyway,” he said. “They’ll move on to the next thing. Welcome to the 21st century.”

Nike, based in Beaverton, Oregon, has made waves before. An ad for the company’s sport hijab went viral in 2017. And a 2010 commercial featuring a voiceover by Tiger Woods’ late father when the golfer was trying to recover from a sex scandal drew mixed reviews.

In August, Nike made news when the French Open banned Williams’ Nike-branded black catsuit. Nike responded by posting an image of her on social media with the line “You can take the superhero out of her costume, but you can never take away her superpower­s.”

Brands run the risk of a backlash in taking a political stand in their advertisin­g.

Starbucks was mocked in 2015 for trying to start a discussion about race by writing the slogan “Race Together” on its cups. Pepsi ended up pulling a commercial that showed Kendall Jenner giving a Pepsi to a police officer; some said the ad trivialize­d the “Black Lives Matter” protests.

John Sweeney, sports communicat­ion professor at the University of North Carolina, said the Kaepernick ad was created to provoke people, and in that respect, it succeeded.

“You may have a negative reaction or a positive reaction, but you have a reaction,” he said. “They wanted something that would stop the presses and stop people in their places.”

For some, the ad has made them bigger fans of the brand.

“I think what Nike did was a tremendous step in fighting against the people who misunderst­and the protests by Kaep and players,” said Seth Buchwalter, of Portland, Oregon, a lifelong Nike customer.

But Wesley Callaway, of Omaha, Nebraska, said he doesn’t agree with kneeling during the national anthem and thinks it is unfortunat­e Nike is featuring Kaepernick, though he said he doesn’t buy many Nike products and won’t make any changes in his shopping habits.

“I don’t mind them protesting brutality,” he said. “I just wish they wouldn’t do it during the anthem.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States