Chattanooga Times Free Press

THE BEST AND WORST OF AMERICA

-

Here is America at its best: Faithbased organizati­ons across the country are volunteeri­ng to help resettle refugee families in their communitie­s. In the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C., where we live, Christian, Jewish and Muslim congregati­ons have formed a partnershi­p called Neighbors to welcome these forlorn foreigners to their new homes.

Here is America at its worst: The Trump administra­tion announced that it is slashing the quota of refugees the U.S. will accept in the next fiscal year to 30,000, the lowest total since the modern refugee system was establishe­d in 1980. But the actual number will probably fall well below that limit, since the administra­tion is doing everything possible to throttle the refugee program and will admit only about 21,000 in the fiscal year ending this month.

“Not only do they reduce the number to record-low levels, they have no intention of even meeting that number during the fiscal year. It further weakens our moral authority and leadership in the world,” said J. Kevin Appleby of the Center for Migration Studies to the New York Times.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo cited “national security interests” as a prime justificat­ion for reducing the quota, but that is a flat-out falsehood. As Leon Rodriguez, who handled refugee issues in the Obama administra­tion, told us, “The reality is that since Sept. 11, we have not had someone admitted as an adult commit an act of terrorist violence in the U.S.”

The real reason for strangling the refugee program is politics. President Trump has made stoking anti-immigrant hysteria a core part of his political strategy since announcing his run for president, and he strongly believes the issue galvanizes his base.

Moreover, as Trump candidly admitted during a rally last April, “The Democrats actually feel — and they are probably right — that all of these people pouring across are going to vote for Democrats. Not for Republican­s.”

Clamping down on refugees is only part of a larger game plan to block foreigners at every possible portal, from imposing a “zero tolerance” policy on undocument­ed border crossers to cracking down on employers that hire illegal workers.

Invoking “national security” reasons for these policies is only one of many lies told by the White House. They also argue that foreigners damage the economy by draining resources and stealing jobs, when the exact opposite is true.

Two veterans of the Obama state department, Ariana A. Berengaut and Antony J. Blinken, wrote in the Times that it is “economic malpractic­e” to bar refugees. “Refugees return more in taxes than they receive in benefits, revitalize towns whose best days seemed behind them and enrich the United States with new energy, ideas and businesses,” they wrote.

Moreover, welcoming refugees benefits America internatio­nally as well as domestical­ly. “The refugee resettleme­nt program is about so much more than just saving lives,” Melanie Nezer, senior vice president at the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society told Politico. “It’s also a diplomatic tool, a foreign policy tool; it stabilizes countries that are hosting the refugees.”

Reducing the refugee program has another cost, too: suffocatin­g the generous spirit and goodwill of faithbased communitie­s who are ready and eager to resettle foreigners.

Trump’s policy toward refugees vitiates our national interest and violates our national values. The worst of America is winning over the best.

 ??  ?? Cokie and Stephen Roberts
Cokie and Stephen Roberts

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States