Chattanooga Times Free Press

Catoosa County updates zoning policies following discrimina­tion complaint

- BY MYRON MADDEN STAFF WRITER

Catoosa County, Georgia, is taking steps to improve its code enforcemen­t policies and training after a discrimina­tion complaint filed against the county last year.

The complaint was made by Ringgold resident Kennith Starnes, who filed it through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmen­t.

The resulting investigat­ion by the federal agency led to the adoption of a Voluntary Compliance Agreement proposed by HUD and signed earlier this month by the Catoosa County Commission. It requires the policy update and additional training.

The events leading up to the complaint began in 2014, soon after Starnes moved to Peachtree Circle to become a host home foster care provider for two people with mental health problems who moved in with him in February of that year.

In April 2014, Starnes received a letter from a Catoosa County code enforcemen­t officer stating that Starnes was in violation of codes pertaining to his home’s R3 zoning because he was running a business on the property, which is not permitted under the residentia­l zoning.

Starnes said he repeatedly tried to explain to county officials that his foster care operation was not a commercial business and did not require a business license, comparing it to running a foster home for children. But zoning personnel responded by stating that only foster children were permitted, as opposed to foster adults, and added that Starnes was not allowed to have people who weren’t related to him living in his home, because of its R3 designatio­n.

In June 2014, Starnes moved out of the home in order to avoid being cited to Catoosa County Magistrate Court, where he could have received a penalty of up to $1,000 and up to 60 days in jail if found guilty of the violations.

Though HUD investigat­ors recently gave him the OK to move back into his home with his fosters earlier this year — as the county’s Unified Developmen­t Code, in fact, allows a homeowner to house up to three foster adults with disabiliti­es — Starnes said local officials never told him he had the option to appeal the county’s initial decision. He said he learned that was possible only through independen­t research after filing his complaint.

“If I would have known now what I knew then, I would have nipped it in the bud and just took care of it,” Starnes said. “But they didn’t offer me any kind of options; they just said ‘no.’”

Starnes claims the lack of options came as an intentiona­l “roadblock” because one of the men in his care had been registered as a sex offender in 1987. Since the man had maintained a clean record for more than 10 years, he was no longer subject to any housing restrictio­ns, according to the national Sex Offender Registrati­on and Notificati­on Act.

Starnes said he learned from a neighbor soon after the initial violation notice in 2014 that his situation had been brought to county zoning officials’ attention by the president of his neighborho­od’s homeowners associatio­n, whom Starnes said had gone house to house petitionin­g to have him and his fosters removed because of the past offense.

Catoosa County denies any discrimina­tory action, and stated that Starnes presented more informatio­n to HUD that was not provided during the county’s initial zoning investigat­ions.

County Attorney Chad Young said he believes the issue came as a result of gaps in knowledge, as opposed to malicious intent. Young agreed with HUD investigat­ors that the codes enforcemen­t officer handling the case could have been more knowledgea­ble about what is and isn’t permitted outside the county’s ordinance and under state law.

He said he hopes the additional external and internal training called for in the Voluntary Compliance Agreement will prevent similar incidents.

The external training session will be conducted by pre-approved instructor­s from HUD, who will provide instructio­n about the Fair Housing Act. The internal training session will be conducted by Young, who will go over state law and county ordinances to ensure code enforcemen­t officers are up to date on local zoning regulation­s and permission­s. He said he also plans to work the instructio­n into employee orientatio­ns for future hires.

“My hope is they’ll be very effective, but honestly, training is only as good as the people who are receiving it,” Young said. “You can train me all you want, but if I don’t employ my training day to day, it isn’t going to help very much. But I feel like our employees want to do the right thing. If they don’t, it’s not because of intent on their part; it might be because they just didn’t understand or know.”

The Voluntary Compliance Agreement also calls for the county to develop a reasonable accommodat­ion policy to make accommodat­ions for individual­s with disabiliti­es that might not be permitted under the county’s zoning ordinance otherwise.

A template for the policy, which will be posted on the county’s website, is expected to be sent to Catoosa officials before the end of the year, Young said.

As a final stipulatio­n of the agreement, the county will designate an existing employee as its ADA coordinato­r. The person in the new role will be responsibl­e for responding to and processing any fair-housing complaints made by residents in the future.

The training, policy update and allocation of responsibi­lities are all intended to make it easier for residents to learn the county’s stance on zoning regulation­s, Young said. They also are intended to make it easier for residents to identify the correct person to contact, or options to consider should they need to report a complaint, allowing the issue to be resolved at the county level without a federal agency needing to intervene.

Young said this is the first time Catoosa has encountere­d a complaint such as Starnes’ during his 20-plus years representi­ng the county.

Starnes, meanwhile, does not believe the actions being taken under the agreement will create lasting change. He said keeping matters in-house would make it easier to “sweep matters under the rug.”

He proposed getting outside agencies involved as a possible solution to prevent further incidents.

Contact Myron Madden at mmadden@timesfreep­ress.com.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States