Chattanooga Times Free Press

Unity Group asks mayor to stall Tubman rezoning

- BY JOAN MCCLANE STAFF WRITER

Chattanoog­a Mayor Andy Berke and the city council need to stop efforts to rezone the city-owned, former Harriet Tubman public housing site until a planning process for East Chattanoog­a neighborho­ods is completed, said community leaders, who spoke during a news conference in front of City Hall on Tuesday.

The public hearing on the city-proposed zone change is scheduled for Monday’s Regional Planning Commission meeting.

The Unity Group, a 50-year-old coalition of neighborho­od groups focused on social justice issues in Chattanoog­a, spearheade­d the news conference, which was attended by around 30 people.

“We are concerned about the limitation­s that the newly proposed M-1 industrial zoning will place on future developmen­t possibilit­ies,” reads the group’s statement released Tuesday. “We wholeheart­edly support the redevelopm­ent of the Harriet Tubman site, but there must be clear measures of accountabi­lity to ensure that our input is acted upon and that low-income and workingcla­ss families will actually benefit from redevelopm­ent.”

The M-1 zoning the city is requesting would allow only one use, such as light industrial.

The Unity Group also made four other requests of City Hall.

› Choose a zoning district for the Tubman site

that allows for a mixture of uses, including light manufactur­ing, retail, commercial and housing.

› Consider leasing the property and not selling it. Ensure the land remains publicly owned long term.

› Cooperate with East Chattanoog­a stakeholde­rs in the creation of an enforceabl­e community benefits agreement (CBA) with a developer or developers of the site. A CBA is a project-specific agreement between a developer and a broad community coalition that details the project’s contributi­ons to the community and ensures community support for the project. They can address a wide range of issues and are legally binding when properly structured.

› Inform community stakeholde­rs prior to any requests for proposals or rezoning proposals related to the redevelopm­ent of the Tubman site.

Sherman Matthews, chairman of the Unity Group, said the group “is speaking to the interest of the community,” not for the community.

“Communitie­s of color or low-income communitie­s are often excluded from the decision-making process when developers eye their neighborho­ods for developmen­t. CBAs hold developers and elected officials accountabl­e,” he said during the press conference.

Berke didn’t attend the news conference, but several city council members were there. When asked about their take on the Unity Group’s public statement, a Berke administra­tion official emailed a statement.

“The City of Chattanoog­a’s Economic & Community Developmen­t department has been working closely with residents and stakeholde­rs in this neighborho­od for years as we consider future uses for the former Harriet Tubman public housing property. We will continue to do so in order to determine the best possible developmen­t plan for this critically important site,” said Charita Allen, deputy administra­tor for economic developmen­t at the city.

Helen Burns Sharp, a former planning director and founder of Accountabi­lity for Taxpayer Money, a public interest advocacy group focused on tax incentives and government transparen­cy, spoke at the news conference and said she supports the Unity Group’s requests of City Hall.

“We respectful­ly request that the city withdraw its rezoning applicatio­n,” said Sharp. “If this doesn’t happen, the message is: ‘We are going to do what we are going to do.’ Avondale could see this as another example of being marginaliz­ed. The city put concrete bleachers in the new Avondale recreation center when other centers get retractabl­e wood bleachers and didn’t prioritize the Avondale census tract, where Tubman is located, when deciding federal Opportunit­y Zones, which were supposed to assist neighborho­ods like Avondale to attract developmen­t.”

Former longtime state Rep. Tommie Brown — a plaintiff in the 1987 federal lawsuit that establishe­d the city’s history of discrimina­ting against black voters and forced the transition from city commission to a mayor-council form of government — said she attended the news conference to give her support to the community members speaking out against City Hall.

“The city needs to acquiesce,” said Brown, who owns a home in the neighborho­od around the Tubman site. “Those community organizers coming together are not alone.

“When you see them at City Hall, don’t think you are looking at two or three people. We will be organizing.”

At a recent meeting between City Councilman Anthony Byrd and his District 8 constituen­ts, James Moreland, an Avondale homeowner, said he and others in the neighborho­od support the mayor’s plan for the Tubman site.

Moreland told the crowd that the Avondale Neighborho­od Associatio­n begged Berke to intervene when the Chattanoog­a Housing Authority was going to sell the Tubman site to “a slumlord” from out of town who was going to keep the deteriorat­ing buildings open, said Moreland.

“It was a hellhole before it was torn down. We were on the news every day concerning crime,” he told other residents at the meeting in November.

The neighborho­od needed jobs, and the mayor wanted the crime level to go down, Moreland said. That was the tradeoff.

Others have said they remember the circumstan­ces and discussion of potential zoning of the site differentl­y.

After the city purchased the site, the Chattanoog­a-Hamilton County Regional Planning Agency and the Chattanoog­a Department of Transporta­tion created multiple concepts for the future of the Tubman site and shared those plans with neighborho­od groups, hoping to get feedback.

Each recommenda­tion was for a mixed-use developmen­t. One concept envisioned by the planning agency and the transporta­tion department, at the time, combined a smaller industrial space with office space, multifamil­y apartments and mixed-use space with retail on the bottom floor and residentia­l units above.

The one concept the planning agency and transporta­tion department didn’t recommend, at the time, was a “convention­al” M1 designatio­n, which would limit the site to a single use, documents show.

Those who attened the news conference, want a decision on zoning to be delayed while the planning process for Area 3 plays out. The community-based planning process is designed to guide future decisions about everything from sidewalks and infrastruc­ture to developmen­t. The plan is for neighborho­ods such as Avondale, Battery Heights, Boyce Station, Bushtown, Churchvill­e, Ferger Place, Gaylan Heights, Glass Farms, Glenwood, Highland Park, Missionary Ridge, Oak Grove, Orchard Knob, Ridgedale, Riverside, Waterhaven and Wheeler Avenue.

 ?? STAFF PHOTO BY C.B. SCHMELTER ?? Organizer and president of Iron Workers Local Union No. 704 Daniel Potter, center, speaks Tuesday on the steps of City Hall during a public statement by the Unity Group of Chattanoog­a about the former Harriet Tubman site.
STAFF PHOTO BY C.B. SCHMELTER Organizer and president of Iron Workers Local Union No. 704 Daniel Potter, center, speaks Tuesday on the steps of City Hall during a public statement by the Unity Group of Chattanoog­a about the former Harriet Tubman site.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States