Chattanooga Times Free Press

WHEN DEMOCRATS OFFEND

-

You could see it coming a mile away.

When various charges hit the top three executives — all Democrats — in the Commonweal­th of Virginia in rapid succession recently, it was quickly realized the fourth in line for governor was a Republican, House Speaker Rep. Kirk Cox. That changed everything.

Suddenly, Gov. Ralph Northam’s remarks about using black face 35 years ago (and an acknowledg­ement and then denial of another instance of doing so), the sexual assault allegation­s against Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax and the similar black face acknowledg­ement of Attorney General Mark Herring didn’t look so bad.

Democrats, who initially were outraged over the governor’s admission, including some who demanded his resignatio­n, grew quieter when Fairfax was accused and quieter still when Herring made his statement. A lawmaker who threatened to bring impeachmen­t proceeding­s Monday suddenly thought better of it.

A group of black clergy and community leaders decided Northam and Herring, who are white, should be given second chances and that any due process against Fairfax, who is black, should play out.

Nervous Democrats, though, worried about the appearance of the governor and attorney general sticking around and the possibilit­y of the lieutenant governor being ousted.

“The sort of irony that makes your head spin is that Herring and Northam are in trouble for behavior related to Virginia’s racial past,” Quentin Kidd, a political science professor at Virginia’s Christophe­r Newport University, told The Associated Press. “And yet it may be the only African-American statewide officehold­er who, at the end of the day, gets in trouble.”

However, a different set of black leaders in the commonweal­th issued a letter that mapped out a way for Northam and Herring to redeem themselves by offering reparation­s. They could, the group suggested, remove more Confederat­e statues and raise money for the state’s historical­ly black colleges.

“In our opinion,” the letter stated, “it is not enough for you to simply apologize.”

In the meantime, Northam — in an apology tour of sorts — called slaves “indentured servants,” inviting more wrath, and pondered his staff’s suggestion that he read the Alex Haley classic “Roots” and watch D.W. Griffith’s 1915 Ku Klux Klan-fueling film “Birth of a Nation.”

Elsewhere among Democrats receiving mulligans for their heinous remarks is freshman U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minnesota, who said lawmakers only backed Israel because of political contributi­ons from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). It was, she said, “all about the Benjamins ($100 bills), baby.”

Called on the anti-Semitic remarks, she apologized, as requested by Democrats, as she had previously done for claims that Israel “hypnotizes the world” and descriptio­ns of “the apartheid Israeli regime.” But in the same statement, she said she stood by her criticism of AIPAC

Omar’s remarks had drawn a rebuke from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, among others, while Republican House Minority leader Kevin McCarthy promised to take “action” against her.

But now her Democratic colleagues caution that they mustn’t go overboard.

Pelosi’s No. 2, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland, said he takes Omar at her word, that she meant no offense and she wasn’t using an anti-Semitic trope about Jewish money.

“I don’t think she is anti-Semitic,” he said. Removing her from her committee assignment­s and taking any other action against her are unnecessar­y, he added.

One needs only look back to last month to see how it works when a Republican says something untoward.

U.S. Rep. Steve King of Iowa unleashed a torrent of criticism in January when he questioned why terms like “white supremacy” were controvers­ial. The Congressio­nal Black Caucus wanted him stripped of his committee assignment­s, and U.S. Rep. Karen Bass, D-California, said giving “comfort to white supremacis­ts” is “something that should never be allowed in the halls of Congress.”

Unlike Democrats with their recent offenders, though, Republican­s took action, admonishin­g his comments and removing him from his committee assignment­s.

Similarly, during the 2018 elections, Florida Republican gubernator­ial candidate Ron DeSantis and U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, R-Mississipp­i, were vilified not for something they did, not for something they said with impunity (like Omar), but for using the common parlance expression­s “monkey this up” and “public hanging,” respective­ly.

DeSantis was accused of using “racist dog whistles” as he criticized a potential socialist agenda his opponent might foster, while Hyde-Smith’s words were termed “reprehensi­ble,” “shameful” and having “no place in our political discourse” as she praised a cattle rancher in front of a statue of Elvis Presley.

The double standard of treatment of Democrats vs. Republican­s was just one of the issues that made voters turn to Donald Trump in 2016. With the recent aforementi­oned hypocrisy, the Democrats’ unveiling of their Green Power Plan, the potential costs of their desired Medicare for All, and the discussion and/or passage by several states of late-term abortion rights, the president will have plenty of other ammunition in 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States