Chattanooga Times Free Press

Barr defends actions

- BY ERIC TUCKER AND MARY CLARE JALONICK

WASHINGTON — Private tensions between Justice Department leaders and special counsel Robert Mueller’s team broke into public view in extraordin­ary fashion Wednesday as Attorney General William Barr pushed back at the special counsel’s “snitty” complaints over his handling of the Trump-Russia investigat­ion report.

Testifying for the first time since releasing Mueller’s report, Barr faced sharp questionin­g from Senate Democrats who accused him of making misleading comments and seeming at

“It was my decision how and when to make [the report] public. Not Bob Mueller’s.” – WILLIAM BARR,

U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

times to be President Donald Trump’s protector as much as the country’s top law enforcemen­t official.

The rift fueled allegation­s that Barr has spun Mueller’s findings in Trump’s favor and understate­d the gravity of Trump’s behavior. The dispute is certain to persist, as Democrats push to give Mueller a chance to answer Barr’s testimony with his own later this month.

Barr separately informed the House

Judiciary Committee that he would not appear for its scheduled hearing Thursday because of the panel’s insistence he be questioned by committee lawyers as well as lawmakers. That refusal sets the stage for Barr to possibly be held in contempt of Congress.

At Wednesday’s Senate Judiciary Committee session, Barr said he had been surprised Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether Trump had tried to obstruct justice, and that he had felt compelled to step in with his own judgment that the president had committed no crime.

“I’m not really sure of his reasoning,” Barr said of Mueller’s obstructio­n analysis, which neither accused the president of a crime nor exonerated him. If Mueller felt that shouldn’t make a decision on whether to bring charges, Barr added, “then he shouldn’t have investigat­ed. That was the time to pull up.”

Barr was also perturbed by a private letter Mueller, a longtime friend, sent him last month complainin­g that the attorney general had not properly portrayed the special counsel’s findings in a four-page letter summarizin­g the report’s main conclusion­s. The attorney general called the note “a bit snitty.”

“I said ‘Bob, what’s with the letter? Just pick up the phone and call me if there is an issue,’” Barr said.

The airing of disagreeme­nts was all the more striking since the Justice Department leadership and Mueller’s team had appeared unified in approach for most of the two-year investigat­ion into potential coordinati­on between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election.

The revelation that

Mueller, who’d been publicly silent for the entire investigat­ion, was agitated enough to send a letter to Barr — which could, and did, become public — lent his words extra credibilit­y with Democrats, who accused Barr of lying under oath last month when he denied that Mueller’s team was unhappy with how their work had been characteri­zed.

Barr downplayed the special counsel’s complaints, saying they were mostly about process, not substance, while raising a few objections of his own in the other direction. He said Mueller did not, as requested, identify grand jury material in his report when he submitted it, slowing the public release of the report as the Justice Department worked to black out sensitive informatio­n.

“His concern was he wanted more out,” Barr said. He said Mueller did not say that Barr had inaccurate­ly characteri­zed the investigat­ion.

Barr also insisted that once Mueller submitted his report, his work was done and the document became “my baby.”

“It was my decision

how and when to make it public,” Barr said. “Not Bob Mueller’s.”

Wednesday’s contentiou­s Senate hearing gave Barr his most extensive opportunit­y to date to defend recent Justice Department actions, including a press conference before the report’s release and his decision to release a brief summary letter two days after getting the report.

But the hearing, which included three Democratic presidenti­al candidates, also laid bare the partisan divide over the handling of Mueller’s report.

Some Republican­s, in addition to defending Trump, focused on the president’s 2016 Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton’s email and campaign practices and what they argued has been a lack of investigat­ion of them.

Television­s across the West Wing, including one just off the Oval Office used by the president, were tuned to cable coverage of Barr’s testimony. Trump told advisers he was pleased with Barr’s combative stance with Democratic senators, according to an administra­tion

official and a Republican close to the White House who were not authorized to speak publicly about private discussion­s.

Trump tweeted Wednesday that the probe was “The greatest con-job in the history of American Politics!” He has told those around him that, after being disappoint­ed by former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, he has found an attorney general loyal to him.

In an interview Wednesday night on Fox Business Network, Trump said he heard Barr “performed incredibly well.” Trump also blasted some of the Democratic senators who questioned Barr, accusing them of “ranting and raving like lunatics, frankly.”

Though Mueller reached no conclusion on obstructio­n, he did report that his probe did not find evidence of criminal conspiracy between the Trump team and Russia. Barr asserted that Trump was “falsely accused” during the investigat­ion and that the president therefore lacked the criminal intent required to commit obstructio­n.

“I didn’t exonerate. I said that we did not believe that there was sufficient evidence to establish an obstructio­n offense which is the job of the Justice Department, and the job of the Justice Department is now over,” Barr said.

Democrats, for their part, moved to exploit the daylight between Barr and Mueller to impugn the attorney general’s credibilit­y. Some also called for Barr to resign, or to recuse himself from Justice Department investigat­ions that have been spun off from Mueller’s probe.

“I think the American public can see quite well that you are biased in this situation and you have not been objective and that would arguably be a conflict of interest,” said Sen. Kamala Harris of California, one of the Democratic contenders for president.

They also pressed him on whether he had misled Congress last month when, at an unrelated congressio­nal hearing, he professed ignorance about complaints from the special counsel’s team. Barr suggested he had not lied because he was in touch with Mueller himself and not his team.

Unswayed, Democrat Patrick Leahy of Vermont said, “Mr. Barr, I feel your answer was purposeful­ly misleading, and I think others do too.”

Neither side broke much new ground Wednesday on the specifics of Mueller’s investigat­ion, though Barr did articulate a robust defense of Trump as he made clear his firm conviction that there was no prosecutab­le case against the president for obstructio­n of justice.

He was asked by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the committee’s top Democrat, about an episode recounted in Mueller’s report in which Trump pressed White House Counsel Don McGahn to seek the removal of Mueller on conflict-ofinterest grounds. Trump then asked McGahn to deny a press report that such a directive had been given.

Barr responded, “There’s something very different firing a special counsel outright, which suggests ending an investigat­ion, and having a special counsel removed for conflict — which suggests you’re going to have another special counsel.”

Barr entered the hearing on the defensive following reports hours earlier that Mueller had complained to him in a letter and over the phone about the way his findings were being portrayed.

Two days after receiving Mueller’s report, Barr had released a four-page letter that summarized the main conclusion­s.

Mueller’s letter, dated March 27, conveyed his unhappines­s that Barr released what the attorney general saw as the bottom-line conclusion­s of the investigat­ion and not the introducti­ons and executive summaries that Mueller’s team had prepared and believed conveyed more nuance and context than Barr’s own letter. Mueller said he had communicat­ed the same concern two days earlier.

“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigat­ion,” Mueller wrote in his letter to Barr. “This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigat­ions.”

Barr appeared unmoved by the criticism. He said repeatedly that Mueller had assured him that Barr’s letter of conclusion­s was not inaccurate but he simply wanted more informatio­n out. Barr said he didn’t believe a piecemeal release of informatio­n was beneficial, and besides, it wasn’t Mueller’s call to make.

 ?? AP PHOTO/SUSAN WALSH ?? Attorney General William Barr testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday
AP PHOTO/SUSAN WALSH Attorney General William Barr testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on Wednesday
 ?? AP PHOTO/SUSAN WALSH ?? Attorney General William Barr is photograph­ed as he sits down to testify Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington.
AP PHOTO/SUSAN WALSH Attorney General William Barr is photograph­ed as he sits down to testify Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States