Chattanooga Times Free Press

Commission members spar over BID involvemen­t

- BY SARAH GRACE TAYLOR STAFF WRITER

Amid a hectic vote to pass the Fiscal Year 2020 budget, the Hamilton County Commission narrowly voted Wednesday to participat­e in the collection of fees assessed by Chattanoog­a’s Business Improvemen­t District.

The BID, which has been spearheade­d by local economic developmen­t nonprofit River City Co., passed the Chattanoog­a City Council in late July after failing earlier in the summer. Now, the management board will collect around $1 million annually from the 196 property owners within the district.

In the agreement approved by the commission, the Hamilton County Trustee’s Office will be responsibl­e for collecting the fees and will retain the service fees associated with the collection­s.

However, with the BID’s hard-fought

formation and notable opposition, many commission­ers opposed the county having any role.

“I see unforeseen liabilitie­s associated with collecting this fee through the county,” District 8 Commission­er Tim Boyd said, expressing his concern that the county may get sued by a property owner for imposing the fee. “The county has no business, no business at all, being involved with city issues and River City [Co.] issues.”

Boyd and Chairwoman Sabrena Smedley, of District 7, referenced emails between the city, county and River City’s attorneys, in which County Attorney Rheubin Taylor said it would be “cleaner” to leave the county out of the process.

“Since the adoption of the BID is approved by the City Council, and since the state statute clearly speaks of the ‘municipal’ establishm­ent of Business Improvemen­t Districts, I would assume that lien enforcemen­t and ‘back tax sales’ would be handled in exactly the same way as a delinquent City property tax,” RCC attorney Allen McCallie wrote in response to the emails last week. “In essence, if delinquenc­ies arise in BID payments, they would be enforced and collected the same way as an unpaid City property tax. Even if annual collection­s of BID assessment­s are handled through the County, I think enforcemen­t would still fall to the City.”

In a similar discussion, the city council establishe­d a clause indemnifyi­ng the city of all liability related to BID issues, a move Boyd called “shoving the dirty business” on to the county.

County Trustee Bill Hullander argued that collecting the fee would be no different than collecting sanitation and other fees for different municipali­ties in the county, which he already does, and would increase his office’s revenue, and ultimately the county’s budget, by around $80,000.

“I think it has a lot to do with their IT department,” Hullander said, maintainin­g that the issue was with a lack of capacity at the city, not a fear of legal ramificati­ons and adding that he hoped to some day take over more of the city’s tax collection responsibi­lities.

District 2 Commission­er Chip Baker called on District 4 Councilman Darrin Ledford, who was in the audience as a “spectator,” to speak to the process.

Ledford, an opponent of the BID, said the council “did not want this money to flow through their city office.”

While the city council did ensure that the fee would stay out of the city budget, recent city level debate had centered on the budget, not the actual collection­s.

River City President Kim White told the commission that this had been “the plan” between the city, Hullander’s office and River City for several months and that if the commission did not approve the agreement, no fee could be assessed and collected by the BID in its first year because Hullander was the only person “set up” to assess the fee that soon.

Hullander added that he had not spoken to any councilmen about the issue throughout their voting process, adding that he wished they “had the respect” to have reached out to him directly about the issue.

After a tie vote while one commission­er was absent and a later re-vote, the commission passed the revised resolution 5-4, approving the agreement under the added stipulatio­ns that the county is indemnifie­d of legal liability and the agreement is set to end on July 1, 2020, at the start of the new fiscal year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States