Chattanooga Times Free Press

TRUMP’S WAR ON WORKERS

-

President Donald Trump talks a good game about helping American workers, but has pursued arguably the most anti-labor agenda of any modern president. Now he has doubled down by choosing for secretary of labor a corporate lawyer who has spent his career battling workers.

This is a bit like nominating Typhoid Mary to be health secretary.

The official mission of the Labor Department emphasizes the promotion of “the welfare of the wage earners,” but Trump’s mission has been to promote the exploitati­on of wage earners.

So Eugene Scalia is a perfect fit. Scalia, a son of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia who has fought unions on behalf of Walmart and other companies, is a talented and experience­d litigator who upon assuming office can disembowel labor.

There’s a larger issue: The relentless assault on labor has gained ground partly because, over the last half-century, many Americans — me included — became too disdainful of unions. It was common to scorn union leaders as corrupt Luddites who used ridiculous work rules to block modernizat­ion and undermine America’s economic competitiv­eness.

There’s something to those critiques. Yet it’s now clear that the collapse of unions — the share of employees belonging to unions has plunged to 10% in 2018 from 35% in the mid-1950s — has been accompanie­d by a rise of unchecked corporate power, a surge in income inequality and a decline in the well-being of working Americans.

For all their shortcomin­gs, unions midwifed the birth of the middle class in the United States. The period of greatest union strength from the late 1940s through the 1950s was the time when economic growth was particular­ly robust and broadly shared. Most studies find that at least one-fifth of the rise in income inequality in the United States is attributab­le to the decline of labor unions.

Unions were also a formidable political force, and it’s perhaps not a surprise that their enfeebling has been accompanie­d by a rise in far-right policies that subsidize the wealthy, punish the working poor and exacerbate the income gap.

“Labor unions, and their ability to create a powerful collective voice for workers, played a huge role in building the world’s largest, richest middle class,” notes Steven Greenhouse in his new book, “Beaten Down, Worked Up.”

“Unions also played a crucial role,” Greenhouse adds, “in achieving many things that most Americans now take for granted: the eight-hour workday, employer-backed health coverage, paid vacations, paid sick days, safe workplaces. Indeed, unions were the major force in ending sweatshops, making coal mines safer, and eliminatin­g many of the worst, most dangerous working conditions in the United States.”

Greenhouse, who covered labor for 19 years for The Times, acknowledg­es all the ways in which labor unions were maddening and retrograde. But he notes that corporatio­ns run amok when no one is minding them.

Union featherbed­ding and rigid work rules have been real problems. Yet without unions to check them, CEOs engage in featherbed­ding and underinves­t in worker training, underminin­g America’s economic competitiv­eness.

Sure, it’s frustratin­g that teachers unions use political capital to defend incompeten­t teachers.

It’s also true that states with strong teachers unions, like Pennsylvan­ia and Vermont, have far better student outcomes than states with feeble unions.

The bigger picture is that America’s working class is in desperate shape. Average hourly wages are actually lower today, after inflation, than they were in 1973, and the bottom 90% of Americans have seen incomes grow more slowly than the overall economy over the last four decades. The reasons are complex, but one is the decline of unions — for unions benefit not only their members but also raise wage levels for workers generally.

So I’ve come to believe that we need stronger private-sector unions. Greenhouse notes that nearly 20% of union activists are fired during organizing drives, because penalties are weak: A corporatio­n may be fined $5,000 or $10,000, but that’s a negligible cost of doing business if it averts unionizati­on.

That’s why we need a secretary of labor who cares about laborers. Trump campaigned in 2016 as a voice for forgotten workers, but he consistent­ly sides with large corporatio­ns against workers, and his nomination of Scalia would amplify the sad and damaging war on unions.

 ??  ?? Nicholas Kristof
Nicholas Kristof

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States