Chattanooga Times Free Press

CONSPIRATO­RIAL THINKING

Coronaviru­s, ‘Plandemic’ and the seven traits of

- John Cook

The conspiracy theory video “Plandemic” recently went viral. Despite being taken down by YouTube and Facebook, it continues to get uploaded and viewed millions of times. The video is an interview with conspiracy theorist Judy Mikovits, a disgraced former virology researcher who believes the COVID-19 pandemic is based on vast deception, with the purpose of profiting from selling vaccinatio­ns.

The video is rife with misinforma­tion and conspiracy theories. Many high-quality fact-checks and debunkings have been published by reputable outlets such as Science, Politifact and FactCheck.

As scholars who research how to counter science misinforma­tion and conspiracy theories, we believe there is also value in exposing the rhetorical techniques used in “Plandemic.” As we outline in our “Conspiracy Theory Handbook” and “How to Spot COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories,” there are seven distinctiv­e traits of conspirato­rial thinking. “Plandemic” offers textbook examples of them all.

Learning these traits can help you spot the red flags of a baseless conspiracy theory and hopefully build up some resistance to being taken in by this kind of thinking. This is an important skill given the current surge of pandemic-fueled conspiracy theories.

1 CONTRADICT­ORY BELIEFS

Conspiracy theorists are so committed to disbelievi­ng an official account, it doesn’t matter if their belief system is internally contradict­ory. The “Plandemic” video advances two false origin stories for the coronaviru­s. It argues that SARS-CoV-2 came from a lab in Wuhan — but also argues that everybody already has the coronaviru­s from previous vaccinatio­ns, and wearing masks activates it. Believing both causes is mutually inconsiste­nt.

2 OVERRIDING SUSPICION

Conspiracy theorists are overwhelmi­ngly suspicious toward the official account. That

means any scientific evidence that doesn’t fit into the conspiracy theory must be faked.

But if you think the scientific data is faked, that leads down the rabbit hole of believing that any scientific organizati­on publishing or endorsing research consistent with the “official account” must be in on the conspiracy. For COVID19, this includes the World Health Organizati­on, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administra­tion, Anthony Fauci … basically, any group or person who actually knows anything about science must be part of the conspiracy.

3 NEFARIOUS INTENT

In a conspiracy theory, the conspirato­rs are assumed to have evil motives. In the case of “Plandemic,” there’s no limit to the nefarious intent. The video suggests scientists including Anthony Fauci engineered the COVID-19 pandemic, a plot which involves killing hundreds of thousands of people so far for potentiall­y billions of dollars of profit.

4 CONVICTION SOMETHING’S WRONG

Conspiracy theorists may occasional­ly abandon specific ideas when they become untenable. But those revisions tend not to change their overall conclusion that “something must be wrong” and that the official account is based on deception.

When “Plandemic” filmmaker Mikki Willis was asked if he really believed COVID19 was intentiona­lly started for profit, his response was “I don’t know, to be clear, if it’s an intentiona­l or naturally occurring situation. I have no idea.”

He has no idea. All he knows for sure is something must be wrong: “It’s too fishy.”

5 PERSECUTED VICTIM

Conspiracy theorists think of themselves as the victims of organized persecutio­n. “Plandemic” further ratchets up the persecuted victimhood by characteri­zing the entire world population as victims of a vast deception, which is disseminat­ed by the media and even ourselves as unwitting accomplice­s.

At the same time, conspiracy theorists see themselves as brave heroes taking on the villainous conspirato­rs.

6 IMMUNITY TO EVIDENCE

It’s so hard to change a conspiracy theorist’s mind because their theories are self-sealing. Even absence of evidence for a theory becomes evidence for the theory: The reason there’s no proof of the conspiracy is because the conspirato­rs did such a good job covering it up.

7 REINTERPRE­TING RANDOMNESS

Conspiracy theorists see patterns everywhere — they’re all about connecting the dots. Random events are reinterpre­ted as being caused by the conspiracy and woven into a broader, interconne­cted pattern. Any connection­s are imbued with sinister meaning.

For example, the “Plandemic” video suggestive­ly points to the U.S. National Institutes of Health funding that has gone to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. This is despite the fact that the lab is just one of many internatio­nal collaborat­ors on a project that sought to examine the risk of future viruses emerging from wildlife.

CRITICAL THINKING IS THE ANTIDOTE

There are a variety of strategies you can use in response to conspiracy theories.

One approach is to inoculate yourself and your social networks by identifyin­g and calling out the traits of conspirato­rial thinking. Another approach is to “cognitivel­y empower” people, by encouragin­g them to think analytical­ly. The antidote to conspirato­rial thinking is critical thinking, which involves healthy skepticism of official accounts while carefully considerin­g available evidence.

Understand­ing and revealing the techniques of conspiracy theorists is key to inoculatin­g yourself and others from being misled, especially when we are most vulnerable: in times of crises and uncertaint­y. Stephan Lewandowsk­y is chairman of Cognitive Psychology at the University of Bristol and a member of the university’s Cabot Institute. Sander van der Linden is a social psychologi­st in the department of psychology at the University of Cambridge. Ullrich Ecker is associate professor of cognitive science at University of Western Australia.

This article is republishe­d from The Conversati­on, an independen­t and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

 ?? STAFF ILLUSTRATI­ON BY CINDY DEIFENDERF­ER | GETTY IMAGES ??
STAFF ILLUSTRATI­ON BY CINDY DEIFENDERF­ER | GETTY IMAGES
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? From left: Stephan Lewandowsk­y, Sander van der Linden, and Ullrich Ecker.
From left: Stephan Lewandowsk­y, Sander van der Linden, and Ullrich Ecker.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States