Chattanooga Times Free Press

Zealous rush to renewable energy is hurting America’s poor

- Paul Steidler is a senior fellow with the Lexington Institute, a public policy think tank based in Arlington, Virginia. He wrote this for InsideSour­ces.com.

NO

The cost of electricit­y is having significan­t, negative effects on the working class and poor. And recent court and regulatory decisions are likely to make the situation much worse.

According to the U.S. Energy Informatio­n Administra­tion, 21% of Americans reduce spending on basic necessitie­s — like food, rent and/or medicine — at least one month every year in order to pay their electricit­y bills. This comes to 25 million households,

including 7 million that must make this rough decision every month. Most have incomes of under $60,000 annually.

In fact, the situation is getting worse. The EIA’s study was from 2018, when the economy was much stronger than it is today. With many people staying at home due the pandemic, experts project that residentia­l energy costs will be up by as much as 25% this summer.

It should not be this way, especially in light of America’s energy boom. Over the past five years, the price of natural gas, which now accounts for nearly 40% of America’s electricit­y generation, has fallen by 33 percent. Yet residentia­l electricit­y prices are up 5% during the same time.

The costs of renewable energy projects are one reason. In New York, the subsidies for the state’s first two offshore wind projects start at

$2.2 billion. The Virginia Electric and Power Company on May 1 informed regulators that renewable energy projects could raise residentia­l costs by $45.92 a month by 2030.

Renewable energy activists have used legal challenges to pipeline expansions to cut off natural gas to states and regions. This raises electricit­y costs in places that rely on natural gas but are far away from where it is produced. For example, residentia­l electricit­y is 66% more expensive in New England than the rest of America.

On July 5, Duke Energy and Dominion Energy announced they are abandoning plans to construct an $8 billion 600-mile natural gas pipeline from West Virginia to North Carolina. This follows an earlier court ruling against the Keystone XL pipeline that could affect dozens of other pipelines.

Commenting on the July 5 announceme­nt, U.S. Energy Secretary Dan Brouillett­e said, “The well-funded, obstructio­nist environmen­tal lobby has successful­ly killed the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which would have lowered energy costs for consumers in North Carolina and Virginia by providing them with an affordable, abundant and reliable natural gas supply from the Appalachia­n region. This project also would have injected millions into the communitie­s surroundin­g the pipeline in Pennsylvan­ia, Ohio and West Virginia and created thousands of jobs.”

Meanwhile, the United States is having an export boom of liquefied natural gas, providing a clean, reliable power source to many countries. It is especially beneficial that such shipments are going to Puerto Rico and our neighbors in the Caribbean, where much electricit­y is generated from oil-based and other highly polluting sources.

Whether used overseas or domestical­ly, natural gas plays a critical role as a baseload power source. It generates electricit­y 24/7 making it among the most reliable of power sources. The other two primary baseload sources — coal and nuclear — are shrinking. Natural gas produces half the greenhouse gases of coal and its expanded use has led to a significan­t reductions in U.S. carbon emissions.

As wind and solar power are intermitte­nt, having baseload natural gas is even more important. Unreliable electricit­y leads to power outages and higher costs like spoiled foods, lost work and accidents.

America, and especially our poor, are facing tough economic times. The expanded use of natural gas will benefit our economy and our environmen­t. Perhaps most important, it will help those who are least fortunate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States