Chattanooga Times Free Press

‘Our hands are tied’: Local aid workers exposed in pandemic

- BY CARA ANNA

JOHANNESBU­RG — The coronaviru­s is exposing an uncomforta­ble inequality in the billion-dollar system that delivers life-saving aid for countries in crisis: Most money that flows from the U.S. and other donors goes to internatio­nal aid groups instead of local ones. Now local aid workers are exposed on the pandemic’s front lines with painfully few means to help the vulnerable communitie­s they know so well.

Often lacking protective equipment, the groups are carrying a bigger burden than ever as COVID-19 adds to the already vast challenges of conflict, drought and hunger in places like Somalia and Afghanista­n.

At times, they tell communitie­s they have nothing to give.

“Our hands are tied,” a South Sudanese aid leader, Gloriah Soma, told an online event last month. She described foreign aid workers being evacuated early in the pandemic or working from home as many feared infection.

“Is this a humanitari­an response?” she asked, saying she hopes the crisis will spark more help “at this critical moment.” Her country can hardly bear another disaster: A five-year civil war killed nearly 400,000 people, and hunger stalks half the population.

The world’s most precarious regions are long accustomed to the sight of internatio­nal aid organizati­ons, often managed by expats. Now some of those foreign workers are questionin­g their roles amid the reckoning over racial injustice in the U.S. and elsewhere.

At times criticized as “white saviors,” some say local partners should be given more responsibi­lity — and money. A local group can do more with it, Soma said. She asserted that $100,000 could help over 10,000 people, while the same amount to an internatio­nal group will only pay one or two staff, “and that’s it.”

Recognizin­g the problem, major global donors including the U.S., Germany and Japan and humanitari­an groups had pledged to give at least one-quarter of internatio­nal aid money to local partners as directly as possible by this year. But just over 2% reached them directly last year, according to a report by the U.K.-based Developmen­t Initiative­s last month.

“COVID is a horrible tragedy, but it’s going to force us to work differentl­y,” the United Nations humanitari­an agency’s director of humanitari­an financing, Lisa Carty, has said. U.N. leaders are discussing “how to make sure money moves more quickly” to frontline responders.

One-quarter of the $1 billion allocated by U.N. country-based funds went to local aid organizati­ons last year, Carty said, “but I think we all agree that we want to do better.”

And those funds manage just a small fraction of overall aid money. Most goes to U.N. agencies, while local aid groups are often seen as subcontrac­tors of those agencies and internatio­nal organizati­ons. Tracking where the money goes remains a challenge.

 ?? AP PHOTO/CHARLES ATIKI LOMODONG ?? A trainee reads a handbook on coronaviru­s prevention, at a training session for community health workers conducted Tuesday by the national NGO “Health Link” in Gumbo, on the outskirts of Juba, South Sudan.
AP PHOTO/CHARLES ATIKI LOMODONG A trainee reads a handbook on coronaviru­s prevention, at a training session for community health workers conducted Tuesday by the national NGO “Health Link” in Gumbo, on the outskirts of Juba, South Sudan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States