ORWELL REARS HIS HEAD
To use the phrase “sexual preference” was completely acceptable a week or so ago. As recently as last month, multiple gay rights publications used the phrase. Leon Panetta had used the phrase in the past couple of years. Joe Biden has used the phrase this year.
Merriam-Webster considered “sexual preference” to be just another version of “sexual orientation.” But then last Tuesday happened.
On Tuesday, the village idiot from Hawaii masquerading as a senator, Mazie Hirono, attacked Amy Coney Barrett for using “sexual preference” instead of “sexual orientation.”
By Tuesday evening, the employees of Merriam-Webster had changed the phrase in their online dictionary to note it was offensive. No, I am not making that up. The dictionary company literally changed it after Barrett’s exchange with Hirono. Steve Krakauer, a former CNN producer who now produces Megyn Kelly’s podcast, documented the change on his social media feed.
Gay rights publications such as The Advocate went on the attack as well. In just 18 days, “sexual preference” went from acceptable to a hate crime. On Sept. 25, 2020, The Advocate tweeted out a story from its publication with this quote: “To come from that history to be able to now, as a director, be telling these stories (…) about young people who are just comfortable with who they are, no matter what their sexual preference is. It’s just glorious and so satisfying.” On Oct. 13, 2020, The Advocate ran a story with the headline “Amy Coney Barrett Blasted for AntiLGBTQ+ Term ‘Sexual Preference.’”
Then there is the matter of the New York Post’s Hunter Biden story. One of the most widely distributed newspapers in America has a major scoop about Joe Biden and his son, and Twitter not only blocked access to the story but also locked accounts trying to share the story and blocked people from even sharing links to the story.
Twitter was fine with a McClatchy story about Michael Cohen going to Prague, even after Robert Mueller specifically said the story was not true. Twitter was fine with BuzzFeed sharing the Steele dossier and rumors about the “pee tape.”
But Twitter would not let a legitimate story from a legitimate publication about Biden be circulated because the material was obtained through alleged “hacking.” It actually was not hacking. Whoever dropped off the laptop, which allegedly belonged to Hunter Biden, for repair never bothered to pick it up. It became the property of the store owner.
The American left and their tech comrades are trying to win by suppressing information they do not like and twisting language to suit their ends. They have dragged us into George Orwell’s nightmare vision.
Progressives feel emboldened by what they see as a Biden win shaping up. They are revealing their own authoritarian nature with a heavy streak of totalitarianism where dissent is not permitted, language they deem hateful is not allowed and the news stories they find inconvenient are buried.
If Twitter’s handling of the Hunter Biden story is not proof enough, consider Portland, Oregon. The national press has stopped covering the riots, but they are still happening. The American media moved on from the story the moment it appeared to be impacting Biden.
Tech giants, mainstream media outlets and Democrats unable to win fairly have chosen to ignore stories that could damage Biden, block conservatives from sharing those stories and even alter the dictionary to advance their cause.
These are dangerous games they are playing, and they will end badly for everyone if they continue.