Chattanooga Times Free Press

COUNTERPOI­NT

If we don’t expand our democracy now, we’ll lose it

- Peter Certo is the senior editorial manager of the Institute for Policy Studies. He wrote this for InsideSour­ces.com.

Thomas Jefferson wrote once that “government is the strongest of which every man feels himself a part.”

It’s a noble idea, calling back to the Constituti­on’s dedication to “we, the people.” Few Americans today are constituti­onal scholars, but most know at least those words. They sum up the democratic sentiments that many of us cherish.

But the truth is, few today would find anything democratic about the government the Constituti­on gave us. Slavery was widely practiced. Women couldn’t vote, nor could men who didn’t own property. By one estimate, just 6% of the population could vote in 1789.

If we cherish the Constituti­on as a democratic document today, it’s because of its hard-won amendments

— protecting freedom of speech and press, ending slavery and enfranchis­ing African Americans after the Civil War, allowing women to vote barely a century ago — along with expansions of voting rights, like during the civil rights era of the 1960s.

Ours is a long history of movements struggling to make government actually resemble the democracy proclaimed in our founding documents. We’ve achieved so much, but these shortcomin­gs also produced unspeakabl­e suffering — from slavery to the Civil War to long years of violence and segregatio­n.

To that list we might also add much of the suffering in more recent years.

The Electoral College system, which elects presidents by a convoluted process favoring smaller, more conservati­ve states, allowed both Donald Trump and George W. Bush to win the White House despite losing the popular vote. The consequenc­es include everything from the Iraq War under Bush to the disastrous U.S. response to the COVID-19 pandemic under Trump.

It’s increasing­ly difficult for voters to repudiate leaders for failures like these. Despite losing the popular vote by nearly 7 million in 2020 — more than twice his popular vote defeat in 2016 — President Trump came within just 40,000 votes in three states of being re-elected by the Electoral College.

The same system badly warps the Senate. Republican senators haven’t represente­d more Americans or won more votes than Democrats in well over two decades, yet they’ve controlled the body for most of that time.

During the worst of the pandemic, the GOP-led Senate repeatedly refused more generous relief measures that might have eased pandemic suffering. Over the years they also shot down immensely popular legislatio­n on gun control, immigratio­n reform and environmen­tal protection.

Even now, in a 50-50 Senate, Democrats are extremely constraine­d by the fact that Republican­s representi­ng 40 million fewer Americans can outvote them.

Ominously, these same systems are enabling the worst attacks on voting rights since Jim Crow. According to the Brennan Center, as of March, Republican­s had introduced an astounding 253 bills in 43 states to restrict voting rights and limit democracy.

These bills do everything from eliminatin­g mail-in voting to letting lawmakers override popular vote decisions — interventi­ons that could be decisive in the Electoral College and Senate, which already require Democrats to win overwhelmi­ng majorities just to eke out victories.

Combined with a fresh round of Republican gerrymande­ring in the House — drawing voting districts designed to minimize representa­tion from the opposite party — Republican­s could easily block the Biden administra­tion’s agenda and then win the House, Senate and White House with a minority of votes.

This is not a government of “we, the people.” So it’s time to amend the Constituti­on again — to replace the Electoral College with a national popular vote, make our Senate more small “d” democratic, end the use of partisan gerrymande­ring, and protect the right to vote.

But amendments are unlikely, since they’d require votes from the same politician­s now gaming the system.

Another option for Democrats would be to simply end the Senate filibuster, pass the For the People Act to protect voting rights and end gerrymande­ring, and admit new states to the union — like the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico — which could partly rebalance the Senate and Electoral College while enfranchis­ing millions of American citizens.

Whatever the approach, if we don’t expand our democracy now, we might lose it for generation­s to come.

James Madison, the lead drafter of the Constituti­on, once warned that “silent encroachme­nts by those in power” were the biggest threat to freedom. If we want to protect our democracy, we can’t be silent about those threats — including those buried in that very Constituti­on.

 ??  ?? Peter Certo
Peter Certo

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States