Chattanooga Times Free Press

THE NEED FOR CONGRESSIO­NAL REFORM

-

Forget Congress. It has become a joke. Trusting it with the American future is like trusting Donald Trump to retire from bombast. Perhaps I exaggerate, but a screech or two for help is needed because we are right now witnessing a degenerati­on that bodes poorly for all of us, even for leftists screeching to make things worse.

The thing is, voters gave us a Senate half Republican and half Democrat, even though the Democrats have a vice president who can cast the winning vote in a tie. After all, she is also president of the Senate, can preside any time she likes, and ought to be doing so daily, seeing as how she is otherwise hard to find.

The Democrats also have a bungling president betraying his promises. His supporters thought they were electing a moderate, even though Sen. Bernie Sanders found an empty space in his thinking and parked his destructiv­e dreams there. President Joe Biden and his ideologica­l buddies rounded up a host of big, complicate­d issues that the left has long wanted to resolve with careless laws and stuffed them in a single bill. It went through a couple of rough moments and finally became a conglomera­tion that is still disgusting but sufficient­ly improved to infuriate progressiv­es.

Biden’s idea had been to soothe the intransige­nce of two moderate Democratic protesters saying no, no, a trillion times no to suffocatin­g expenditur­es made necessary by welfare and climate change proposals that were wisely questioned. Progressiv­es are the new obstructio­nists whining at going from an understate­d cost of

$3.5 trillion to $1.85 trillion noted by chicanery specialist­s to actually be about $4 trillion. It’s spectacula­rly inflationa­ry without even taking note of a separate $1 trillion infrastruc­ture bill.

Our president and his win-all, takeall cronies are caught in a squeeze he really ought to address by doing something sane, intelligen­t, principled, democratic and coalescing — namely persuading Democrats to put each separate policy issue up for a vote by itself.

Done the right way, there would be debate and intense examinatio­n, a step-by-step process. A legislator would more likely know what is really in each bill without having to say he or she will vote for it because of fondness for three other bills in a package reflecting a party’s druthers. Legislator­s should debate others with contrary views, introduce amendments, perhaps compromise with the other party.

Even though I am dead-set against the overall bill even in its new form, I also believe there is value in some of the individual proposals if they were thoughtful­ly detailed or just maybe left to the states.

Wanting to terrorize the wealthy for the sin of inequality, the left also has begged for absolutely ruinous tax measures, not knowing something basic. We have the most progressiv­e tax system in the developed world. The costs of the new proposals are made to seem less than they are because it’s falsely said the laws will last just a few years instead of decades.

Congress has been decaying because of transferri­ng its duties to regulators, letting staffers mostly figure things out, going along with legally amiss executive orders and putting partisansh­ip above honest reflection. Republican­s are guilty, too, but it hardly follows that we don’t need attentive citizen voters serving as an oversight committee.

Even though I am dead-set against the overall bill even in its new form, I also believe there is value in some of the individual proposals if they were thoughtful­ly detailed or just maybe left to the states.

 ?? ?? Jay Ambrose
Jay Ambrose

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States