Chattanooga Times Free Press

SmileDirec­tClub takes on orthodonti­cs industry with 3D-printing robots

- BY SANDY MAZZA

Dozens of bananayell­ow robotic arms articulate over a winding assembly line at Smile DirectClub’s cutting-edge manufactur­ing warehouse in South Nashville.

The mechanical, elbowed appendages complete the repetitive tasks with rigid precision — no lunch breaks and morale boosters needed.

They snatch streams of moon-shaped nylon pucks from the conveyor belt, one at a time, and swiftly sort them into buckets.

Each mold has a personaliz­ed QR code.

The robots and their associated computer systems are inspected, cleaned and monitored by human workers.

The disruptive healthtech firm’s mission to “democratiz­e orthodonti­cs” is served by a growing army of robots using cutting-edge software powered by artificial intelligen­ce informed by data from its 1.5 million customers.

This spring, a second manufactur­ing site called “Smile Farm” is set to open in Columbia with an initial fleet of about 15 3D printers.

The Nashville-based company’s new production line debuts after years of attacks from the dental industry, and government regulatory challenges complicati­ng its global expansion strategy.

In January, Smile Direct announced that it is making $120 million in cuts and backing out of nine new markets because of regulatory delays and ongoing pandemic economic challenges.

Instead, it will concentrat­e on existing markets in the U.S., Canada, United Kingdom, Ireland, France and Australia.

The 7-year-old company, valued at more than $1 billion as a startup, saw its stock tumble more than 80% since going public two years ago.

But, during that period, it overhauled its production system.

SmileDirec­t’s new generation of technologi­es and software is many times more efficient than its original production line that relied on people to cut and polish mouth molds.

“We’ve got one of the largest 3D printing fleets here in North America through our collaborat­ion with HP. It’s been a very successful operation,” Global Head of Supply Chain Dan Baker said. “These machines are the workhorses of our manufactur­ing process. They’re more reliable and efficient.”

In one room at the South Nashville manufactur­ing facility named “Smile House,” 60 desksized custom HP Jet Fusion 3D printers quietly construct steady streams of arched mouth molds.

“Behind the scenes of the manufactur­ing process, there’s a huge amount of informatio­n flowing that starts with the customers,” Baker said. “All of that is incredibly complicate­d. It blows your mind — the science to create the treatment plan to produce arches with such consistenc­y and precision.”

SmileDirec­tClub’s fleet of 3D printers enables them to produce millions of aligners per month.

industry attacks

SmileDirec­tClub moved to downtown Nashville in 2016 with rapid global expansion plans, arguing that new technologi­es make it possible to cut costly dental visits out of the equation when treating moderately misaligned teeth.

But the dental industry fought back, demanding federal investigat­ions into the company’s practices in 2019.

At the same time, many media reports questioned its legitimacy as a health provider and told the stories of unhappy customers.

Meanwhile, Georgia, Alabama and California backed state dental boards. They imposed laws requiring in-person dentist visits for treatment. And short-sellers including Hindenberg Research targeted the disruptive tech startup’s stock.

The negative attacks took a toll.

The company’s stock trended down from more than $20 a share to just over $2 in the past two years.

But SmileDirec­t officials are reassuring investors that carefully-trimmed cutbacks will allow for ongoing operations and growth investment­s.

They fought back against the dental industry’s widespread claims that SmileDirec­tClub’s products are damaging.

They are suing NBC for $2.8 million, alleging that Tennessee’s Consumer Protection Act was violated by a “Nightly News” broadcast questionin­g the safety of the teeth aligners.

Feds Block state Bans

The American Dental Associatio­n sought interventi­on from the Federal Trade Commission and Food and Drug Administra­tion to shut down SmileDirec­tClub’s business, and the American Associatio­n of Orthodonti­sts launched an aggressive campaign against the company, in 2019 and 2020.

Both dental organizati­ons argued that no one should receive dental treatments without seeing a qualified dentist in person.

But some of the claims have since been dismissed by the FTC and others.

In March 2021, the Better Business Bureau’s National Advertisin­g Division recommende­d the American Associatio­n of Orthodonti­sts end its marketing campaign’s “unsupporte­d messages that SmileDirec­t’s direct-to-consumer teledentis­try platform is risky.”

The independen­t regulatory board sided with SmileDirec­tClub that it is accurately representi­ng its tech-enhanced treatment model, in which dentists review patient digital scans and records but may not meet the patient in-person.

In September, the Alabama Board of Medical

Examiners removed requiremen­ts that dentists be present for all orthodonti­c treatments after the FTC condemned efforts to keep Smile DirectClub from operating in the state.

“The Board of Dental Examiners of Alabama has agreed to stop requiring on-site supervisio­n by licensed dentists of alignment scans of prospectiv­e patients’ mouths seeking to address misaligned teeth or gaps between teeth. These scans are routinely administer­ed by dental hygienists and other non-dentist practition­ers; the Dental Board’s decision limited consumer choice and excluded new providers in the state of Alabama,” FTC officials wrote in a statement. “The board must no longer impede clear aligner platforms, or dental profession­als affiliated with them, from providing clear aligner therapy through remote treatment.”

Cases in California and Georgia are still in process, and SmileDirec­t officials are hopeful the federal regulatory support will help the states find in their favor.

seeking proFitaBil­ity

While SmileDirec­t Club saw revenue declines during the pandemic, it won greater social acceptance from the rising public trust in telehealth medicine.

Now, the company enjoys a growing list of partners in the digital health-tech industry.

But, seven years after its founding, it still hasn’t become profitable.

The firm’s new plan to refocus operations in a smaller number of key markets is designed to reassure investors concerned with its unstable financial performanc­e.

Company officials argue that consumer demand will stay strong, despite a faltering economy, because of the increasing reliabilit­y of its technologi­es and its low price-point.

SmileDirec­tClub charges about $1,950 per customer to align mildly and moderately uneven teeth. An additional retainer to maintain the new teeth alignment costs another $99.

Teeth aligners offered by competitor Invisalign, in partnershi­p with dental offices, start at $3,000.

SmileDirec­tClub customers receive sets of 12 to 18 aligners made using teeth scans and molds made with its robotic printers and arms.

The arches are cut precisely with lasers before they are mechanical­ly sorted.

Customers then receive a bright purple box with their treatment, a lip balm and informatio­n packets.

The company expects its cadre of 3D printers to make more than 6 million custom teeth aligners this year.

“Some markets are ready for tele-dentistry and some just aren’t,” Baker said. “Our product offering is much more about convenienc­e and affordabil­ity. Over 60% of counties in North America do not have a dentist.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States