Knoxville’s police department oversight board expands its power
“Until now, we could only see the cases once they were already closed. Now that we can see how the conversations go once the investigation has been conducted, it should be very insightful.”
— KNOXVILLE POLICE ADVISORY AND REVIEW COMMITTEE DIRECTOR TIFFANY DAVIDSON
The Tennessee legislature may want to limit citizens in how much of a say they have over how their community’s police departments work, but Knoxville is trying to forge its own path.
The city’s citizen review board, known as PARC (Police Advisory and Review Committee) has recently seen its powers expanded through an agreement hammered out between committee director Tiffany Davidson and Knoxville Police Department Chief Paul Noel.
For the first time, the relationship between the committee and Knoxville Police will be governed by a formal operating agreement that allows committee staff far greater access to the agency’s disciplinary process and the ability to steer complaints toward third-party mediation as well as codifying a number of informal procedures, officials said last week.
‘STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION’
“Hopefully this is a step in the right direction,” Davidson said. “A lot of people in our community feel their concerns are dumped to the wayside … When we talk about police accountability or the lack thereof, I think the community will appreciate knowing there is another set of eyes.”
The Police Advisory and Review Committee was created in 1998 after the deaths of four men, three of them Black, in confrontations with Knoxville Police officers over a seven-month period. Although all the officers were cleared of wrongdoing, members of the Black community lashed out at what they perceived to be a culture of brutality and indifference.
City leaders responded by forming the review committee, which provides an independent review of police activity and makes recommendations to the chief of police. It is comprised of seven volunteers served by a full-time executive director hired by the mayor and one investigative manager.
The committee’s authority has traditionally been limited to reviewing internal affairs investigations and making suggestions that Knoxville Police can choose to ignore. Critics, in turn, have often accused it of being a toothless exercise in public relations rather than a source of genuine accountability.
Citizen review boards have been adopted in a growing number of cities across the United States over the past three decades. In Tennessee, each of the four largest municipalities — Memphis, Nashville, Chattanooga and Knoxville — have one.
POLITICALLY DIVISIVE
But review boards have proven to be politically divisive even as police reform movements have gained traction. In 2019, Tennessee legislators who wanted to shield police departments from public scrutiny voted to strictly limit the powers of review boards, effectively barring them from having the authority to conduct independent investigations.
But Davidson, who has been working closely with Noel since he took office six months ago, said the Knoxville department seems to be moving toward greater transparency and accountability.
One of the most important changes is that review committee staff will now be allowed to observe pre-disciplinary hearings, according to Davidson.
“Until now, we could only see the cases once they were already closed,” she said. “Now that we can see how the conversations go once the investigation has been conducted, it should be very insightful.”
The police department will allow the review committee much greater access to its internal records and statistics that track uses of force and disciplinary actions, including the agency’s “Early Warning Database,” according to the agreement.
Also, it explicitly permits review committee members to gather complaints about police misconduct from any available sources, including anonymous tips or “third parties not directly” connected to a complaint.
Another new feature is that the review committee can try to steer some complaints through mediation, a process Davidson hopes will lead to both officers and civilians feeling more satisfied with outcomes.
“A lot of times when we get complaints, they don’t necessarily warrant an internal affairs investigation,” she said. “Citizens sometimes say, ‘I don’t necessarily want an officer to be fired, I just want them to understand how they made me feel.’”
Allegations of serious or criminal misconduct wouldn’t be recommended for mediation, she explained, while complaints of officer rudeness or disinterest may be ideal candidates for it.
“We hope they could come to some kind of resolution or at least understanding,” Davidson said. “We are all human, and we all make mistakes. If this is taken advantage of, I think this could be a great opportunity.”
MISUNDERSTANDINGS
Police spokesperson Scott Erland echoed many of Davidson’s comments and pointed out that many complaints lodged against Knoxville officers are the result of “misunderstandings.”
“If two people get together and hear each other out, they can work things out,” Erland said. “We think it’ll improve community relations. Also, an officer can possibly go that route instead of taking a reprimand that goes in their personnel file.”
Erland also pointed out that the new agreement formalizes a lot of interactions that “were on a handshake basis previously.”
“The advantage of this agreement is that it will live beyond the current PARC director and the current police chief,” he said.