CAN WE LEARN FROM COVID POLICIES THAT FAILED KIDS?
FORT WORTH, Texas — If you’re anything like me, you’ve done your best to blot out the COVID era from your memory. It doesn’t seem productive to ruminate on the days spent in fear and uncertainty; “hunkering down” in our homes; our children’s smiles hidden from us behind masks that even Dr. Anthony Fauci now appears to concede were (as applied) of nominal benefit.
But the effects of our COVID response, which was in many cases destructive, still linger. Nowhere is that more apparent than in the realm of education.
In parts of the country, some students lost a year (or more) of full-time in-person school. In certain cases, that was by choice; some parents worried that schools would be super-spreaders — they weren’t — and voluntarily kept them home.
For other students, going to class in-person was simply not offered as an option.
Frequent “exposure” quarantines that needlessly kept healthy kids at home for weeks at a time only made things worse.
Learning loss abounded, in reading and math especially, and for Black and Latino children in particular.
Children’s mental health also suffered; isolation and depression ballooned, the effects of which have yet to be fully realized.
None of this is fun to reflect on, but all of it was rehashed last month during a congressional hearing which featured one of the key players behind prolonged school closures: Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers.
Testifying about her organization’s role in a COVID-response oversight hearing, the union boss insisted that she and her minions were working to keep schools open from day one.
“We spent every day from February on trying to get schools open,” she said. “We know that remote education was not a substitute for opening schools.”
Indeed, there is little doubt that she and her cohorts knew the costs of prolonged virtual school, especially for vulnerable communities. That much seemed obvious.
There is little doubt also, that she, as an influential union leader, did everything within her power to keep schools closed as long as possible.
Indeed, her own words, tweets and interviews throughout the pandemic, as well as her behind-the-scenes lobbying of the CDC to keep schools closed in the name of “protecting teachers,” belie her claims.
And recent revelations indicate that Weingarten and her team had a direct line to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and White House officials who even adopted some union-proposed language in their guidance for school reopenings, which slowed full reopening of inperson instruction for students.
I won’t belabor the depths of deceit reached in her testimony. You can watch it yourself.
But Weingarten’s falsehoods speak to another effect that school closures and other pandemic mitigation have had on the public: a loss of trust in our public schools.
This reality has manifested in many ways, but most obviously in declining enrollment in public schools. Nationwide, enrollment has dropped 3%.
I’d argue that on some level, this is not a terrible thing for education.
Distrust in public school leadership has increased public interest in charter and private options; it’s helped make the case for school choice a policy priority.
It may even be why the appetite for education savings accounts in Texas and other states has never been higher.
This silver lining aside, distrust in public institutions is seldom good. So it’s important for us to understand how and why public trust in schools cratered. Even if it means recalling that less than pleasant time.