Chattanooga Times Free Press

Is buy now, pay later a holiday debt trap?

- Christophe­r A. Hopkins, a chartered financial analyst, is co-founder of Apogee Wealth Partners.

There are few places where financial innovation is more evident than the choice to defer payment for online purchases. Buy now, pay later options from about a dozen fintech providers like PayPal, Klarna, and Affirm offer customers instant credit at checkout and allow purchases to be stretched over four interest-free payments. Adoption of such payments has grown dramatical­ly since 2019, primarily among Millennial­s and Generation Z.

Yet several studies raise concerns over the growing share of users who are already in or nearing financial distress. Pay later customers on average are more likely to be heavily in debt, have other credit delinquenc­ies, carry high-interest credit card balances and rely on costly alternativ­e services like payday and pawn loans. Forecasts for increased use of these retail loans during the holiday shopping season could spell trouble for the most prolific users.

Online shopping checkout often includes a pay later option (also called a point-ofsale loan). Selecting this button allows you to complete the purchase with payments spread over several installmen­ts. The payment processor runs a “soft” credit check (which does not affect your credit score) and, if approved, presents a payment plan or series of automatic drafts from your bank or credit card account. These loans are not reported to the credit agencies (unless the buyer misses a payment), and sellers that partner with these fintech processors incur typical fees of 3-6% of the purchase price. Roughly 70% of applicatio­ns are approved, including many to customers with subprime credit scores or even delinquent payments on other loans.

The attraction for merchants is evident. According to data form Payments.com, a pay later option increases the likelihood of completing a sale by 20% and results in a 30-50% boost in average order size. For users of the instant loan option, the

benefits are more ambiguous.

A detailed review of pay later users by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau confirms some concerning trends that many financial counselors had suspected. Consumers using the option are predominan­tly younger (Millennial­s and Gen Z), they are not poor, and they have access to and utilize other sources of credit. But they are over-indebted as a group. The bureau found, for example, that 69% of pay later users carried a balance on at least one credit card for some period during the previous year compared with 42% of non-users, and the median sum of credit card balances for users was a whopping $24,679. The average balance among all Americans is around $6,000.

Those who used buy now, pay later had significan­tly higher debt in other areas as well. They are two times as likely to carry student loan debt (due in part to their age cohort), three times as likely to owe other personal debt and four times as likely to have taken out a payday loan. In fact, users on average utilized more of every credit product except, interestin­gly, mortgages. They are less likely to own a home, but 2 ½ times as likely to have bounced a check in the past 12 months.

In addition to being more indebted, pay later debtors are on average more financiall­y fragile. The bureau study found that credit card utilizatio­n rates (percent of the credit limit used up) fluctuated between 40%-50% for pay later debtors, compared with around 30% for those who don’t use the option. Utilizatio­n of 30% is generally considered the threshold for financial risk. And indeed, pay later aficionado­s had broadly lower average credit scores: 580-669 (considered sub-prime) for users versus 670-739 for non-users. A research paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that one third of all pay later shoppers had credit scores below 620 and surprising­ly discovered this group of consumers was offered the option more often than shoppers with scores above 760, suggesting the possibilit­y that retail loan offers are specifical­ly targeted at less financiall­y secure consumers.

The research also found that pay later customers spent 20% more than non-users and that 10% ultimately transferre­d the loan balance to a credit card.

As one might suspect from this data, pay later users struggle more to meet their debt service obligation­s. They are 2 ½ times as likely to have experience­d a payment delinquenc­y over the past year. According to the financial bureau, a full 33% say the primary reason they pay later is because their credit cards are maxed out. Data firm Morning Consult reports that one quarter of pay later users missed a payment in August, triggering late fees and interest charges negating the financial benefit of the service. Meanwhile, use of the service is forecast to grow by 25% over the next three years.

All of which presents a cautionary tale for the holidays. Adobe Analytics expects holiday pay later use to increase 17% over last year’s shopping spree. And in 2020, when pay later was relatively young, 70% of purchases were luxury and designer goods. Increasing­ly, and alarmingly, consumers are financing essentials like food and household goods. Adobe expects a 37% jump in use of pay later to buy groceries this year. Not a good sign just as student loan payments resume.

Financial innovation often brings convenienc­e and added utility into our lives when used responsibl­y. Buy now, pay later can be a useful tool but its ready availabili­ty can also reinforce existing financial stress. The holiday season is a good time to budget carefully and avoid overspendi­ng when it’s so easy to delay the reckoning.

 ?? ?? Chris Hopkins
Chris Hopkins

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States