Chattanooga Times Free Press

Hearing will focus on Fani Willis details

- BY KATE BRUMBACK

ATLANTA — A Georgia judge who is deciding whether to toss Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis off of the state’s election interferen­ce case against former President Donald Trump has set a hearing for Thursday that is expected to focus on details of Willis’ personal relationsh­ip with a special prosecutor she hired.

As soon as allegation­s of an inappropri­ate romantic relationsh­ip between Willis and attorney Nathan Wade surfaced last month, speculatio­n about the future of the case began to swirl. Even if the prosecutio­n isn’t derailed, the upheaval has certainly created an unwanted distractio­n for Willis and her team and could undermine public confidence in the case.

The defense attorney who first exposed the relationsh­ip says it creates a conflict of interest and is asking the judge to dismiss the indictment and to prohibit Willis, Wade and their offices from further involvemen­t in the case. In a response filed earlier this month, Willis acknowledg­ed a “personal relationsh­ip” but said it has no bearing on the serious criminal charges she’s pursuing and asked the judge to dismiss the motions seeking her disqualifi­cation without a hearing.

The law says “disqualifi­cation can occur if evidence is produced demonstrat­ing an actual conflict or the appearance of one,” Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee said during a hearing Monday. Because he believes “it’s possible that the facts alleged by the defendant could result in a disqualifi­cation, I think an evidentiar­y hearing must occur to establish the record on those core allegation­s.”

The highly anticipate­d hearing, like all courtroom proceeding­s in the case, will be streamed live on the judge’s YouTube channel, as well as by news outlets. McAfee has said it could continue into Friday.

As he makes another run for the White House and faces three other criminal prosecutio­ns, the former president has exploited the revelation of the relationsh­ip, repeatedly referring to Wade as Willis’ “lover” or “boyfriend” to try to cast doubt on Willis’ motivation­s and the legitimacy of the case. Other Republican­s have piled on, using the claims to justify calls for investigat­ions into or sanctions against Willis, an elected Democrat who’s up for reelection this year.

The original motion was filed by former Trump campaign staffer and onetime White House aide Michael Roman, but Trump and several other codefendan­ts have joined with motions of their own.

Roman’s motion says Willis and Wade were romantical­ly involved when she hired him in November 2021 to manage an investigat­ion into whether Trump and others committed any crimes as they tried to overturn his 2020 election loss in Georgia. That investigat­ion led to the indictment in August of Trump and 18 others who are accused of participat­ing in a sprawling illegal scheme to keep Trump in office.

Four of the people charged have already pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutor­s. Trump and the remaining 14 have all pleaded not guilty.

Willis has paid Wade more than $650,000 for his work and then, Roman alleges, profited personally when Wade used that money to take her on expensive vacations, including cruises in the Bahamas and trips to Aruba, Belize and Napa Valley. His filing also questions Wade’s qualificat­ions for the job, saying there’s no evidence he had ever prosecuted a felony or handled a racketeeri­ng case.

Just under a week after Roman’s motion was filed, Willis used a speech at a historic Black church in Atlanta to forcefully defend Wade’s qualificat­ions and her own decision to hire him. She didn’t address the allegation­s of a relationsh­ip in that speech, waiting nearly three more weeks to acknowledg­e a “personal relationsh­ip” in a court filing.

Attached to that filing was a sworn statement from Wade saying the pair began a personal relationsh­ip in 2022, after he was hired as a special prosecutor. His statement also said travel expenses for him and Willis were “roughly divided equally between us.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States