Chicago Sun-Times (Sunday)

CHICAGO DAILY NEWS: LAST WEEK IN HISTORY

-

It’s safe to say that the Watergate scandal has touched nearly every aspect of American culture, so much so that it’s common to see the suffix “-gate” added to other words to denote a serious scandal — Gamergate, Nipplegate and Beachgate, to name a few.

The original “-gate” scandal, in which President Richard Nixon and his associates attempted to cover up their involvemen­t in the June 17, 1972, break-in at the Democratic National Committee Headquarte­rs in a Washington, D.C., hotel, resulted in Nixon’s resignatio­n in 1974. The early reports that appeared in the Chicago Daily News show how the break-in investigat­ion unfolded.

The first mention of the Watergate break-in appeared just two days after the incident.

“Democratic National Chairman Lawrence F. O’Brien wants a thorough government probe of an apparent attempt to bug his office that resulted in the arrest of a salaried employee or [sic] President Nixon’s re-election campaign committee,” a United Press Internatio­nal report read.

Already Nixon’s name was tied to the burglary attempt, and investigat­ors only had a handle on the most basic facts. The break-in happened about 2:30 a.m. on June 17, the UPI report said. Five men, including former CIA employee James W. McCord, had been arrested and charged with second-degree burglary.

The report said that McCord’s arrest was particular­ly noteworthy because he served as security coordinate­d for the Nixon reelection committee with a “takehome-salary” of $1,209 per month. Interestin­gly, Bob Dole, then serving as the Republican National Chairman, added that McCord also “holds a contract to provide security services for the GOP national committee.”

Metropolit­an police investigat­ing the crime told UPI that the men wore surgical gloves and carried extensive photograph­ic equipment and electronic surveillan­ce devices. “They said the instrument­s were capable of intercepti­ng both telephone communicat­ions and regular conversati­ons.” The FBI had opened its own investigat­ion into the burglary.

The next day, O’Brien filed a $1 million damage suit against the Committee for the ReElection of the President and the five “bungling burglars,” Washington bureau reporter William J. Eaton wrote.

It would take almost a full year for the court of public opinion to turn against Nixon. He was even reelected in November 1972, winning 60% of the popular vote and every state except Massachuse­tts.

But even in the week following the Watergate burglary, Daily News columnist Joseph Kraft posited that if Nixon and his cronies were involved, then it shouldn’t surprise anyone.

“The central fact is that the President and his campaign manager have set a tone that positively encourages dirty work by low-level operators,” he wrote on June 26.

The columnist did have one telling prediction:

“Unless the president and Mitchell clean up their own operations, they are going to pay a price,” he wrote. “They will find that they cannot get away with keeping the president above the battle.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States