Chicago Sun-Times (Sunday)

BATTLE OVER LIMITS ON CHILEAN SEA BASS SPLITS U.S., U.K. — AND RUSSIA

- BY JOSHUA GOODMAN

MIAMI — It’s one of the world’s highestfet­ching wild-caught fish, sold for $32 a pound at Whole Foods and served up as meaty fillets on the menus of upscale eateries across the U.S.

But Russia’s obstructio­n of long-standing conservati­on efforts, resulting in a unilateral rejection of catch limits for the Chilean sea bass in a protected region near Antarctica, has triggered a fish fight at the bottom of the world, one dividing longtime allies, the U.S. and U.K. government­s.

The diplomatic feud, which has not been previously reported, intensifie­d after the U.K. quietly issued licenses this spring to fish for the sea bass off the coast of South Georgia, a remote, uninhabite­d U.K.-controlled island some 1,400 kilometers east of the Falkland Islands.

As a result, for the first time since government­s banded together 40 years ago to protect marine life near the South Pole, deep-sea fishing for the pointy-toothed fish is proceeding this season without any catch limit from the 26-member Commission on the Conservati­on of Antarctic Marine Living Resources or CCAMLR.

The move essentiall­y transforme­d overnight one of the world’s best-managed fisheries into a France-sized stretch of outlaw ocean — at least in the eyes of U.S. officials threatenin­g to bar U.K. imports from the area.

“In a world beset by conflict, the U.K. is playing a risky game,” said Will McCallum, head of oceans at Greenpeace U.K. “The history of Antarctic protection is one of peaceful cooperatio­n for the common good of humanity. Russia’s consistent willingnes­s to abuse the process cannot excuse unilateral action by other Members. We trust that countries who have previously imported South Georgia toothfish will not accept the catch of what is now an unregulate­d fishery.”

For decades, the fishery near South Georgia was a poster child for internatio­nal fisheries cooperatio­n, one that brought together sometimes adversaria­l powers like Russia, China and the U.S. to protect the chilly, crystal blue southern ocean from the sort of fishing freefor-all seen on the high seas.

Last year, as tensions with the West were rising over Ukraine, Russia took the unpreceden­ted step of rejecting the toothfish catch limits proposed by the Antarctic commission’s scientists. The move was tantamount to a unilateral veto because of rules, common to many internatio­nal fisheries pacts, that require all decisions to be made by unanimous agreement.

But critics say the U.K.’s response — issuing licenses without a CCAMLR-approved catch

limit — is unlawful under the commission’s rules and weakens the Antarctica Treaty establishe­d during the Cold War that set aside the continent as a scientific preserve. U.S. officials have also privately told their U.K. counterpar­ts that they would likely bar imports of any toothfish caught near South Georgia, according to correspond­ence between U.S. fisheries managers and members of Congress seen by The Associated Press.

The fight underscore­s how Russia’s attempts to undermine the West have extended to even obscure forums normally removed from geopolitic­al tussles. It also risks reviving Britain’s tensions with Argentina, which invaded South Georgia in 1982 as part of its war with the U.K. over the Falkland Islands.

But the outcome couldn’t be more consequent­ial: With fish stocks across the globe declining due to overfishin­g, consumers are demanding greater transparen­cy about where the filets on their plates are sourced. Central to that effort is rules-based internatio­nal fisheries management on the open ocean and environmen­tally sensitive areas like the polar regions.

“It sets a dangerous precedent,” said Evan Bloom, who for 15 years, until his retirement from the State Department in 2020, led the U.S. delegation to the CCAMLR.

“What the Russians did clearly violates the spirit of science-based fisheries management,” added Bloom, who is now an expert on polar issues at the Wilson Center in Washington. “But that doesn’t necessaril­y mean that the U.K. can act unilateral­ly.”

Three of the four vessels authorized by the U.K. to fish near South Georgia starting May 1 belong to Argos Froyanes, a British-Norwegian company that pioneered techniques credited with dramatical­ly reducing seabird mortality in the south Atlantic.

One of its customers is New York-based Mark Foods, the largest U.S. supplier of sea bass certified by the Marine Stewardshi­p Council, the industry’s gold standard for sustainabi­lity.

CEO Barry Markman declined an interview request but said his company would not import any product deemed illegal by U.S. authoritie­s.

“We have been working collaborat­ively with U.S. officials to resolve this situation in a favorable manner,” he wrote in an e-mail.

Chilean seabass — the commercial name of Patagonia toothfish — from South Georgia is sold at both Whole Foods and Orlando-based Darden Restaurant­s, which operates the finedining chains Eddie V’s and The Capital Grille. Neither company responded to a request for comment.

 ?? JOSHUA GOODMAN/AP ?? Fillets of Chilean sea bass caught near the U.K.controlled South Georgia island are displayed for sale at a Whole Foods Market in Cleveland, Ohio, on Monday.
JOSHUA GOODMAN/AP Fillets of Chilean sea bass caught near the U.K.controlled South Georgia island are displayed for sale at a Whole Foods Market in Cleveland, Ohio, on Monday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States