Chicago Sun-Times

Bogus facts confuse Americans on immigratio­n

- BY LINDA CHAVEZ Linda Chavez is the author of “An Unlikely Conservati­ve: The Transforma­tion of an Ex- Liberal.”

Anew study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineerin­g, and Medicine shows, once again, that immigratio­n and immigrants are good for America.

But don’t expect hallelujah­s from the restrictio­nist crowd — or indeed even fair reporting.

The Washington Times greeted the report with the highly misleading headline, “Mass immigratio­n costs government $ 296 billion a year, depresses wages,” while Breitbart News screamed, “National Academies’ Study Shows $ 500 Billion Immigratio­n Tax on Working Americans.” Both are so misleading as to constitute a disinforma­tion propaganda campaign.

No wonder so many on the right have abandoned Ronald Reagan’s welcoming approach to “anyone with the will and the heart to get here.”

The study, which was conducted by an eminent group of economists — including Harvard’s George Borjas, who is a critic of low- skilled immigratio­n — shows both shortand long- term benefits from immigratio­n for our economy and most workers. It also shows short- term costs to state and local government­s — mostly in the form of educating immigrants’ children — which are more than recouped when those children reach working age.

Confusing? A bit, so let me break it down.

The 40 million immigrants in this country fall mostly into two categories: high- skilled, highly educated adults and low- skilled, less educated adults and children, some of whom, about 11 million, are here illegally. The former group, according to the study, may improve wages for some groups of native- born workers, whereas the latter has some negative impact on the wages of two groups: prior immigrants and the native- born who have less than a high school education. These effects, though real, are small and pertain to relatively few American- born workers.

But what about the costs to taxpayers these immigrants incur? Contrary to popular belief in some circles, immigrants are taxpayers, too — even most who are here illegally. All immigrants pay both sales and real estate taxes, either directly or through their landlords. These taxes help fund schools and state and local government­s. Those who work also pay federal income and Social Security taxes. Some immigrants here illegally are paying into false Social Security accounts, but that hurts them, not other taxpayers or the government.

Overall, immigrants contribute slightly more to the federal government than they receive in benefits, but immigrants can be a burden on some states, at least temporaril­y. The reason? Immigrants, espe- cially those from Latin America, are likelier to have school- age children living in their home than the nativeborn population, primarily because they are younger. The median age of native- born Americans is roughly 40, while the median age of Hispanic immigrants is much lower, 26 for the largest group, Mexicans, with only Cubans approachin­g the national median.

Another point that restrictio­nists miss is that our aging population is the biggest drain on government. Seniors like to think they’ve already paid for the checks and the health care they receive from Social Security and Medicare, but for most people, it’s not true. Current workers are paying for these benefits, because most people 65 or older will receive more in benefits over their lifetime than they paid in during their working years.

Without younger immigrants paying into the system now, Social Security and Medicare would eventually collapse or prove so onerous on workers that the programs would depress the overall economy. The actuaries at the Social Security Administra­tion predict that increasing immigratio­n by nearly 50 percent a year would boost Social Security’s long- term health significan­tly, contributi­ng about a half- trillion dollars in increased contributi­ons, thus narrowing the 75- year Social Security funding gap from 1.92 percent of total payroll to 1.67 percent.

The academies’ study is long and technical, but its general message is clear. “Immigratio­n has an overall positive impact on long- run economic growth in the U. S.,” as the press release states it.

Too bad this message isn’t getting through to everyone.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States