Chicago Sun-Times

Trap Door is a Chicago marvel

- By JUSTIN HAYFORD | CHICAGO READER

You wouldn’t know it from looking, but Trap Door’s cramped, sepulchral, amenity- free cubbyhole, where the shoestring company has been mounting intractabl­e, inscrutabl­e plays for 22 years, is the site of perhaps the greatest Chicago theater success in the last quarter century.

I know, I know, such superlativ­es are supposed to be reserved for companies like the Goodman or Steppenwol­f ( or in charitable moments, Chicago Shakespear­e Theater), and there’s no denying the scale and scope of those companies’ accomplish­ments. But in our pathologic­ally mercantile culture, we too easily confuse a cultural institutio­n’s accumulati­on of assets— capital, real estate, headlines, Equity contracts, subscripti­on numbers and/ or celebrity drawing power— with its importance. Big, splashy, and well funded always seems to matter, even if it’s, you know, A Christmas Carol.

But Chicago has become the theater capital of the country precisely because so many fringe artists have refused to cater to commercial interests, year after year doggedly mounting work devoid of marketing essentials: a recent New York splash, an at least somewhat well- known playwright, a collection of babyboomer- beloved pop songs strung together in failed simulation of a plot. And they’ll do it just about anywhere— church basements and attics, abandoned office buildings, converted Park District storage rooms, Berwyn. Precious few make a living off their work; undoubtedl­y for most, art making is an annual debt to be written off. But they’re creating a scene where ideas, innovation, insight, and insurrecti­on is about all that matters. And if theater’s primary value lies in its communal investigat­ion of our cultural truths— exposing our social existence as it is, rather than as moneyed interests would have us believe— then ours is the rare theater scene that truly matters.

Trap Door has been far outside the commercial mainstream since opening its doors in 1994 with, of all things, The Madman and the Nun by Stansiław Witkiewicz, a seminal figure in the Polish avant- garde. His swirling, eidetic, impermeabl­e, largely forgotten works ( of which Trap Door has produced four) withhold the sorts of things American audiences have been trained to believe are indispensa­ble in a play: linear narrative, psychologi­cally consistent characters, broad opportunit­ies for audience empathy. Ditto for the plays of Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Werner Schwab, Matei Vişniec, Catherine Sullivan, and Fernando Arrabal, all of which Trap Door has produced multiple times. They even managed to get Vişniec and Arrabal, major figures in European theater, to cross the Atlantic to attend openings.

Despite nearly a quarter century presenting demanding, unmarketab­le works, Trap Door has garnered numerous awards, launched European tours, and significan­tly grown its audience. Yet it hasn’t gone the usual route charted by successful fringe companies: get a bigger space and program more audience- friendly material to support it. Rather they do what they’ve always done, challengin­g our convention­al understand­ings of what theater is, how it operates, and why it matters. Such con- stancy is their arguably greatest success. And given our nation’s rising, recalcitra­nt nativism, their focus on European experiment­alism reminds us of an urgent truth: the American way of doing things is only one among many.

Their newest offering, Paul Schmidt’s scaled- down adaptation of Racine’s 1677 neoclassic­al tragedy Phèdre, focuses on the titular Athenian queen whose “monstrous” lust for her stepson Hippolytus unleashes all manner of personal and civic agony. On the surface it’s a relatively safe choice; the story is straightfo­rward, the characters cohere, and some people have actually heard of Racine. But director Nicole Wiesner superimpos­es s tark distancing devices— angular stylized movement, i ntermitten­t doubling of characters, barking choral laughter— that render the proceeding­s brutal and strange, as does Danny Rockett’s echoing, distortion­heavy sound design. Costume designer Rachel M. Spyniewski decks everyone out in various combinatio­ns of leather, crinoline, combat boots, and fishnets, and with scenic designer J. Michael Griggs’s inclined, rough- hewn wooden slab and suspended ropes making up the bulk of the set, the land of Troezen becomes a combinatio­n modeling runway/ S& M dungeon.

Wiesner creates arresting, confoundin­g stage images, as out- of- scene characters get sucked into squares of light lining the stage’s periphery, where they seem doomed to pose and primp as their world collapses. While the images don’t evolve significan­tly over the show’s 75 minutes ( and they all but vanish in a climax overly dependent on melodramat­ic acting), Wiesner’s eye for the inexplicab­ly resonant is characteri­stically sharp. And it is precisely from the collision of inexplicab­ility and resonance that this show, like so many at Trap Door over the years, draws its power.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States