Chicago Sun-Times

THEIR KIND OF TOWN

Mick Jagger & Keith Richards Chat Chicago blues, and the arrival of ‘ Exhibition­ism’

- By MIRIAM DI NUNZIO | SUN- TIMES STAFF REPORTER

In a 2015 interview with Rolling Stone magazine, Buddy Guy said of the Rolling Stones: “When they came to America, they recognized some of the greatest musicians that I had admired – Ike and Tina Turner, Muddy Waters, Howlin’ Wolf – and let America know who we were. They let white America know what the blues is. We owe those guys all the thanks in the world.” Guy was referring to 1964, the year the Stones also arrived at Chicago’s iconic Chess Records, where t he l egendary bluesman would first meet the band. “Muddy Waters and Willie Dixon walked straight in my studio while I was singing with a bunch of white guys, who lined up against the wall while I was singing,” Guy told Rolling Stone. “I got pissed off: ‘ Who in the hell are these guys?’ I had never seen a white man with hair that l ong and high- heeled boots before. They had come to do an audition for Chess Records.”

The British rockers had reached their blues mecca; they had arrived at the place where the magic happened. It was Chicago blues. It was Rolling Stones blues.

“I think, really, we were intrigued by the sound of [ the Chess studio], but it was also a pilgrimage in a way,” Rolling Stones lead singer Mick Jagger said during a recent phone chat. “It was where all these [ blues artists] recorded this music, in this room. We were like kids! I don’t know what they thought of us be- cause English people had never come in there and they must have thought we were a bit odd. [ Laughs] We met some of our favorites there. We met Chuck Berry and Muddy [ Waters] and many others in that studio, and recorded with some of the engineers they worked with. And we recorded some stuff in there that was quite good. It was a good room.”

In a separate interview, Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards added, “Recording was pretty simple then — four- track tape. But it was the room. [ Some studios] had just a magical sound about them and Chess was one of them. Another one was Muscle Shoals [ in Alabama]. You can’t put your finger on it. It’s just a room that pulses with whatever’s going on. They’re few and far between. When you get ’ em you love ’ em.”

Chess Records would be immortaliz­ed by the Rolling Stones via their 1964 release “2120 South Michigan Avenue,” named for the address of the studio, and they would return for two subsequent recording sessions over the years.

The link between Chicago and the Rolling Stones is an intimate one, spanning the band’s five- decade ( and counting) career. That career is celebrated in “Exhibition­ism,” the massive memorabili­a/ retrospect­ive exhibit opening at Navy Pier April 15. It’s an exhibit that pulses with the band’s signature brand of pop, rock and Chicago blues.

Jagger and Richards talked about the influence of blues on their work and what their music has meant to the blues. And why “Exhibition­ism,” as Jagger explained, “would keep you amused for an hour.”

Here are excerpts from the conversati­ons with Jagger and Richards.

Q. Buddy Guy told Rolling Stone, [ the blues] “owes you guys all the thanks in the world.” Why did the blues affect you so much?

Mick Jagger: Maybe in my early teenage

years I’d seen some blues artists on TV. I dunno, I just liked it. Again, there’s lots of reasons why suburban kids might like this. It’s also the directness of the music because pop music especially in this period was very saccharine.

I liked pop music and I love pop music now, but in that period, it was very sort of insincere and saccharine. Blues was perhaps a more direct means of communicat­ion, and it didn’t pull as many punches. It was more grown- up. It wasn’t music for teenagers really. It was popular music. Just a different genre. The rhythms were good. ... Artists like [ those who came out of Muscle Shoals] or Howlin’ [ Wolf ] or Willie [ Dixon] or Robert Johnson — nobody was hearing those sounds in British or American pop, for that matter. There were exceptions to that. There were people coming from Chicago who were having big success. For instance, Chuck Berry was recording for Chess. He wasn’t like an out- and- out Howlin’ Wolf- type blues singer, but he was a blues performer certainly. He had hit records which were No. 1 in Britain and America. And [ we] were like, who’s this guy who records with this label called Chess? Who else do they have on that label?

Even people like Bo Diddley. Bo Diddley had hit records that were pop hit records. So, you’d go buy that Bo Diddley [ album] for that one song and you’d hear all this other stuff and you realized you’re in another place, that Chicago blues world. And if you’re interested in it you start delving deeper into it.

When we would come to America, ... [ at that time] the blues were not really liked, but black music was generally quite popular. But not necessaril­y [ blues] music. But it’s very sweet of Buddy [ to say that].

Q. Everyone knows how the blues informed the Stones, but how did the Stones inform the blues? Where did you take it?

Keith Richards: I don’t know. All I know, to us, considerin­g what Buddy Guy said and what others have said, Muddy Waters included, it just became a bond between us. I don’t think we thought of ourselves as the missionari­es [ for the blues] that we turned out to be.

Q. But you did become blues ambassador­s.

Keith Richards: Yeah, I guess so. White kids in America never went to the end of the dial on the radio, you know? And we did in England. And so, what we did was we played what they missed the first time around. Mick Jagger: We started off being a blues band. . . . Everything [ we play] is kind of informed by that in a way. Even if I’m moving toward some other kind of style, the blues is always present. ... The Rolling Stones have a lot of different styles that they work on. We went through periods where we played almost all blues beats and ballads. So, we’re really informed by the blues. But rock music is always informed by the blues. When we play rock ‘ n’ roll it’s always with a blues background.

Q. Why did blues affect you so deeply? And why did i t take a British band to l et white America know about t his American- born genre?

Keith Richards: I can’t really tell you why. I think most American music comes f rom mixture of old English, Irish and Scottish and African rhythms. In England, I grew up listening to a lot of jazz cause my mum loved jazz: Billy Eckstine, Ella Fitzgerald. So, I grew up with that going on in the background, along with pop music thrown in. And then when I got into playing music I wanted to find out, where did it come from? It led me to the blues. ... And found a bunch of guys who felt the same way. But it was particular­ly Chicago blues that impressed us. We just wanted to know how guys got that sound. … Our connection with Chicago comes from Chicago music, especially South Side Chicago blues. … It was just the tightness, the way these guys played together.

Q. We have to talk about “Exhibition­ism,” ( an 18,000- square- foot exhibit at Navy Pier featuring more than 500 rare band items, from film and fashion to music and paintings). Why did you keep all this stuff over the years?

Mick Jagger: The only thing I kept was the clothes. I don’t really have anything else. We had to pull things from many other people. We had some guitars, some artwork; there’s a lot of artwork in the exhibition. We had films and videos. … [ In the exhibit] you’re walking into a series of rooms. You have to break it down. How are you gonna open? Where do you go next after the slick opening i n technology hall? ... [ So, the exhibit begins] where you go into this grimy apartment [ a re- creation of the Stones’ first London flat].

Q. Is the apartment just as you remembered it?

Mick Jagger: Pretty much. The building still exists. It’s not far from where I’m speaking to you, actually. ... There was a designer who re- creates interiors for other exhibition­s, so we built it up and tried to give it the spirit of the original thing. Pretty much the same look.

Q. I can only i magine the creativity that flowed in that room, the conversati­ons you guys had. Did all of it come rushing back to you?

Mick Jagger: I walked into it [ at a London preview] and laid on the bed. I did. And I saw all the cigarette butts around me. [ Laughs] I remember I said, “I don’t remember there being that many dishes in the sink,” so I started taking some out! [ Laughs] Keith Richards: I gave [ the design team and curators] the keys to the warehouse and said, “See what you can find.” We gave them the tour through those vast warehouses and let ’ em pick what they wanted. I found a lot of stuff I thought I’d lost. [ Laughs] I found it in the exhibition, actually. There’s a pair of boots of mine. I don’t know how they got in the exhibition!

Q. What can people learn about the Stones from this exhibit?

Keith Richards: I don’t’ know. It depends on your point of view and your age. If you’re into the Stones you’re going to see a Stones exhibition. ... I started bumping into an old memory at every corner of it. It’s nostalgia. But there’s lots of good stuff in there. It could be an eye opener for non- fans. It’s worth a visit.

Q. What’s the secret formula for the music of the Rolling Stones, music that has evolved constantly and remained relevant?

Keith Richards: I call i t Charlie Watts! [ Laughing] But I don’t know. If there was one, I’d bottle it. It’s something between the chemistry between Mick and Charlie and Ronnie and myself just seems to work. It keeps us young. More of the interviews is available online at suntimes. com/ entertainm­ent.

 ??  ?? MARTIN BERNETTI/ AFP/ GETTY IMAGES
MARTIN BERNETTI/ AFP/ GETTY IMAGES
 ??  ??
 ?? | MARIA CARDONA/ SUN- TIMES ?? The Style Gallery at “Exhibition­ism” includes 70 original outfits worn by the Rolling Stones, which showcase the stylistic progressio­n and impact the band has had on the fashion world.
| MARIA CARDONA/ SUN- TIMES The Style Gallery at “Exhibition­ism” includes 70 original outfits worn by the Rolling Stones, which showcase the stylistic progressio­n and impact the band has had on the fashion world.
 ?? SUN- TIMES PHOTO BY TOM CRUZE ?? Charlie Watts ( from left), Mick Jagger and Keith Richards perform during a Rolling Stones concert at Chicago’s Aragon Ballroom on Sept. 15, 2002. |
SUN- TIMES PHOTO BY TOM CRUZE Charlie Watts ( from left), Mick Jagger and Keith Richards perform during a Rolling Stones concert at Chicago’s Aragon Ballroom on Sept. 15, 2002. |
 ?? DAVE J. HOGAN ?? Charlie Watts ( from left), Keith Richards, Ronnie Wood and Mick Jagger attend a 2016 preview of “The Rolling Stones: Exhibition­ism” in London.
DAVE J. HOGAN Charlie Watts ( from left), Keith Richards, Ronnie Wood and Mick Jagger attend a 2016 preview of “The Rolling Stones: Exhibition­ism” in London.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States