Chicago Sun-Times

WON’T ‘ TAKE THE BAIT’

Jesse Jackson Jr. not discussing other possible crimes, whether there was deal with N. Y. U. S. attorney’s office

- BY LYNNSWEET AND TINA SFONDELES Staff Reporters

Former U. S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. declined to say Tuesday if he became an informant in a 2015 federal investigat­ion involving possible crimes “by him and others”— while also questionin­g the timing of the disclosure of a Justice Department letter outlining the matter in light of his pending divorce.

In a statement on behalf of the former congressma­n, Jackson’s Chicago divorce attorney Brendan Hammer sidesteppe­d the issue of whether Jackson had become an informant in an undisclose­d criminal case being handled by the U. S. attorney’s office in Manhattan, New York.

“While extra- judicial tactics may be the chosen approach of some, Mr. Jackson chooses not to take the bait, much as he may want to do so,” the statement said. “As such, any inquiry relative to the substance of yesterday’s story, such as it is, should be directed to the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York.”

The letter, first disclosed by the Chicago Sun- Times onMonday evening, indicates that as Jackson was wrapping up his federal sentence for looting his campaign fund, he also was negotiatin­g to cooperate with the U. S. attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York in another criminal investigat­ion.

“Mr. Jackson has informed the government of potential violations of law by him and others,” reads the Aug. 16, 2015, letter from Assistant U. S. Attorney Daniel C. Richenthal in Manhattan to Jackson criminal attorney John Colette.

The name of the target or targets of the investigat­ion weren’t included in the letter. Aspokesman for the U. S. attorney’s office in Manhattan declined to comment Tuesday.

Jackson and his now- estranged wife Sandi Jackson, in the midst of a messy divorce, both were sentenced to prison in 2013 for their roles in stealing $ 750,000 in campaign cash.

The surfacing of the 2015 Justice Department letter at this time might be connected to the divorce, Hammer suggested in his statement on behalf of Jesse Jackson Jr.

The statement said the “protection, support and stability” of the Jackson children are Jesse Jackson’s foremost concern.

“Whether that concern is shared by Ms. Jackson remains an open question after yesterday’s reporting — curiously coming as it does only days before this case enters a new phase with an evidentiar­y hearing in Washington and a court appearance in Chicago,” the statement said.

New “facts, sworn testimony, records, documents and other materials” will be introduced in open court, Hammer also said.

Neither Sandi Jackson nor an attorney representi­ng her could immediatel­y be reached for comment.

The Jacksons are arguing over whether their divorce should be handled inWashingt­on, D. C., where Sandi Jackson lives with their two children, or in Chicago, where Jesse Jackson now resides. They’ve filed for divorce in those respective jurisdicti­ons, with hearings in both cases set for April 28.

Colette on Monday acknowledg­ed to the Sun- Times that Jesse Jackson had communicat­ed with federal authoritie­s in 2015. “I remember part of that agreement, but I don’t have the document in front of me right now,” he said then.

Reached again Tuesday, Colette said, “I’m not going to really talk about the situation. . . . This is something that is coming up apparently in a hotly contested divorce case. And I have no comment on it.”

Asked if Jackson ever became an informant, Colette said, “I can’t comment on it.”

The letter outlines that Jackson had agreed to secretly record conversati­ons as part of the New York investigat­ion.

Jackson “has indicated that he desires to undertake certain actions, including participat­ing in monitored and/ or recorded telephone and/ or email conversati­ons and meetings, with the intention of providing the government with additional informatio­n regarding these potential violations of law,” the letter reads.

It isn’t known what the other investigat­ion entailed, what possible crimes Jackson might have told prosecutor­s about or whether the cooperatio­n deal was formally entered into.

 ?? | ASHLEE REZIN/ SUN- TIMES ?? Former U. S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. in February
| ASHLEE REZIN/ SUN- TIMES Former U. S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. in February

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States