Chicago Sun-Times

Executive order on religion sparks fight

Civil liberties groups say Trump action could permit bias against gays, women, other beliefs

- Maureen Groppe and David Jackson

President Trump could sign a controvers­ial executive order on religious freedom as early as Thursday, and civil liberties groups are gearing up for a fight.

Lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union and the Human Rights Campaign plan to immediatel­y file legal challenges against the order if it is as broad as a draft that leaked this year.

They’re concerned Trump’s actions will enable discrimina­tion against gays and religious minorities and allow many employers to deny birth control services in the health care plans they offer.

“It would create an unpreceden­ted license to discrimina­te with taxpayers’ funds, undermine women’s health care and elevate one narrow set of religious beliefs over all others,” said Sarah Warbelow, legal director for the Human Rights Campaign.

Trump is likely to at least discuss the executive order Thursday, which is the National Day of Prayer.

The scene at the White House is set for a signing. “There could be no better day to sign an executive order on religious freedom than the National Day of Prayer,” said Mat Staver who heads the Liberty Counsel, a legal group that has fought same- sex marriage.

Even as the Trump administra­tion finalizes its plans, the opposition has begun: Gay and civil rights advocates protested in front of the White House Wednesday, saying the pending executive order is the latest Trump administra­tion action that attacks the rights of immigrants, Muslims, women and members of the LGBTQ community.

Religious conservati­ves have long pushed Trump to renew what they said is an “appreciati­on for religious freedom” that the Obama administra­tion undermined despite a law created in 1993 to protect religious freedom.

“It’s simply bringing the federal government back in line with” the Religious Freedom Restoratio­n Act, Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said last month about the need for an executive order.

Ryan Anderson, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, said the executive order could “clarify in a strengthen­ing way” how to apply the Religious Freedom Restoratio­n Act, which says a government can “substantia­lly burden” a person’s exercise of religion only if it advances an important government interest — and does so in the least restrictiv­e way possible.

“If the prior administra­tion interprete­d existing federal law in a way that constricte­d religious liberty, this would be returning it to a robust understand­ing of religious liberty,” Anderson said.

During his campaign, Trump pledged that the “first priority of my administra­tion will be to preserve and protect our religious liberty.”

Religious conservati­ves waited anx- iously for action — and some were disappoint­ed when the White House announced in January that Trump would not undo Obama’s executive order protecting employees from antiLGBTQ workplace discrimina­tion while working for federal contractor­s.

The administra­tion emphasized that Trump was proud to be the first Republican presidenti­al nominee to mention the LGBTQ community in his nomination acceptance speech and “is determined to protect the rights of all Americans, including the LGBTQ community.”

Perkins said the religious freedom executive order has been delayed in part because “there are some countervie­ws” within the administra­tion about whether it’s necessary.

The directive would primarily affect organizati­ons that receive a significan­t amount of federal funding to provide services such as homeless shelters, hospice care and child welfare services, the Warbelow said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States